The code below uses an unsafe GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving
extension to break Data.Set
by inserting different elements with different Ord
instances:
{-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-}
import Data.Set
import System.Random
class AlaInt i where
fromIntSet :: Set Integer -> Set i
toIntSet :: Set i -> Set Integer
instance AlaInt Integer where
fromIntSet = id
toIntSet = id
newtype I = I Integer deriving (Eq, Show, AlaInt)
instance Ord I where compare (I n1) (I n2) = compare n2 n1 -- sic!
insert' :: Integer -> Set Integer -> Set Integer
insert' n s = toIntSet $ insert (I n) $ fromIntSet s
randomInput = take 5000 $ zip (randomRs (0,9) gen) (randoms gen) where
gen = mkStdGen 911
createSet = Prelude.foldr f empty where
f (e,True) = insert e
f (e,False) = insert' e
main = print $ toAscList $ createSet randomInput
The code prints [1,3,5,7,8,6,9,6,4,2,0,9]
. Note that the list is unordered and has 9
twice.
Is it possible to perform this dictionary swapping attack using other extensions, e.g. ConstraintKinds
? If yes, can Data.Set
be redesigned to be resilient to such attacks?