I am trying to call a stored procedure in Python but it keeps giving me the following error. The procedure is written in SQL Server 2008 and I am using PyODBC to call the method and pass parameters to it.
import pyodbc
cnxn = pyodbc.connect('DRIVER={SQL Server};SERVER='+serveripaddr+';DATABASE='+database+';UID='+userid+';PWD='+password+'')
cursor = cnxn.cursor()
cursor.execute("{call p_GetTransactionsStats('KENYA', '41')}")
rows = cursor.fetchall()
The last line results in the following exception:
ProgrammingError: No results. Previous SQL was not a query.
What could be the problem here?
Here's what happens. The stored procedure contains several steps. When it is executed from the SQL Server Management studio, it is easy to see how each step results in a separate message such as "(3 row(s) affected)"
, and only the very last step produces the response.
Apparently, when invoked via pyodbc
cursor, each of those separate steps produces a separate resultset
, where all the resultsets, but the very last one, contain no data that could be read via fetchall()
.
Hence, one option to solve the problem is to iterate over these resultsets using nextset()
until you find one which does produce the result, e.g.:
while cursor.nextset(): # NB: This always skips the first resultset
try:
results = cursor.fetchall()
break
except pyodbc.ProgrammingError:
continue
A nicer option is, as mentioned in a different answer, to use the SET NOCOUNT ON;
directive, which seems to prevent all of the intermediate, empty (# rows affected)
resultsets. The directive can be simply prepended to the proc invocation, for example:
cursor.execute("set nocount on; exec MyStoredProc ?", some_parameter)
results = cursor.fetchall()
Can you add SET NOCOUNT ON to you SP and try
if you can not modify SP, first execute this statement xand then call SP
For stored procedures, you don't need .fetchall(). I had a similar issue and taking away that tag cleared it up.
I encountered same issue.
Remember to use 'SET NOCOUNT ON' in your stored proc.
Also, check there is no 'print' statement in your stored proc.