Is there a way to call a private Class method from

2020-08-09 08:08发布

问题:

Other than self.class.send :method, args..., of course. I'd like to make a rather complex method available at both the class and instance level without duplicating the code.


UPDATE:

@Jonathan Branam: that was my assumption, but I wanted to make sure nobody else had found a way around. Visibility in Ruby is very different from that in Java. You're also quite right that private doesn't work on class methods, though this will declare a private class method:

class Foo
  class <<self
    private
    def bar
      puts 'bar'
    end
  end
end

Foo.bar
# => NoMethodError: private method 'bar' called for Foo:Class

回答1:

Here is a code snippet to go along with the question. Using "private" in a class definition does not apply to class methods. You need to use "private_class_method" as in the following example.

class Foo
  def self.private_bar
    # Complex logic goes here
    puts "hi"
  end
  private_class_method :private_bar
  class <<self
    private
    def another_private_bar
      puts "bar"
    end
  end
  public
  def instance_bar
    self.class.private_bar
  end
  def instance_bar2
    self.class.another_private_bar
  end
end

f=Foo.new
f=instance_bar # NoMethodError: private method `private_bar' called for Foo:Class
f=instance_bar2 # NoMethodError: private method `another_private_bar' called for Foo:Class

I don't see a way to get around this. The documentation says that you cannot specify the receive of a private method. Also you can only access a private method from the same instance. The class Foo is a different object than a given instance of Foo.

Don't take my answer as final. I'm certainly not an expert, but I wanted to provide a code snippet so that others who attempt to answer will have properly private class methods.



回答2:

Let me contribute to this list of more or less strange solutions and non-solutions:

puts RUBY_VERSION # => 2.1.2

class C
  class << self
    private def foo
      'Je suis foo'
    end
  end

  private define_method :foo, &method(:foo)

  def bar
    foo
  end
end

puts C.new.bar # => Je suis foo
puts C.new.foo # => NoMethodError


回答3:

If your method is merely a utility function (that is, it doesn't rely on any instance variables), you could put the method into a module and include and extend the class so that it's available as both a private class method and a private instance method.



回答4:

Nowadays you don't need the helper methods anymore. You can simply inline them with your method definition. This should feel very familiar to the Java folks:

class MyClass

  private_class_method def self.my_private_method
    puts "private class method"
  end

  private def my_private_method
    puts "private instance method"
  end

end

And no, you cannot call a private class method from an instance method. However, you could instead implement the the private class method as public class method in a private nested class instead, using the private_constant helper method. See this blogpost for more detail.



回答5:

This is the way to play with "real" private class methods.

class Foo
  def self.private_bar
    # Complex logic goes here
    puts "hi"
  end
  private_class_method :private_bar
  class <<self
    private
    def another_private_bar
      puts "bar"
    end
  end
  public
  def instance_bar
    self.class.private_bar
  end
  def instance_bar2
    self.class.another_private_bar
  end
  def calling_private_method
    Foo.send :another_private_bar
    self.class.send :private_bar
  end
end
f=Foo.new
f.send :calling_private_method 
 # "bar"
 # "hi"
Foo.send :another_private_bar
# "bar"

cheers



回答6:

This is probably the most "native vanilla Ruby" way:

class Foo
  module PrivateStatic # like Java
    private def foo
      'foo'
    end
  end
  extend PrivateStatic
  include PrivateStatic

  def self.static_public_call
    "static public #{foo}"
  end

  def public_call
    "instance public #{foo}"
  end
end

Foo.static_public_call # 'static public foo'
Foo.new.public_call # 'instance public foo'
Foo.foo # NoMethodError: private method `foo' called for Foo:Class
Foo.new.foo # NoMethodError: private method `foo' called for #<Foo:0x00007fa154d13f10>

With some Ruby metaprogramming, you could even make it look like:

class Foo
  def self.foo
    'foo'
  end

  extend PrivateStatic
  private_static :foo
end

Ruby's metaprogramming is quite powerful, so you could technically implement any scoping rules you might want. That being said, I'd still prefer the clarity and minimal surprise of the first variant.



回答7:

Unless I'm misunderstanding, don't you just need something like this:

class Foo
    private
    def Foo.bar
        # Complex logic goes here
        puts "hi"
    end

    public
    def bar
        Foo.bar
    end
end

Of course you could change the second definition to use your self.class.send approach if you wanted to avoid hardcoding the class name...