In this XPath expression: //div[@id=”myID”]|p
, does the //
operator get applied to both sides of the union operator? Or would this expression simply return all div
elements in the document that have an id
attribute value of myID
and all p
elements that are children of the context node?
Is there a reference for XPath operator binding and associativity?
XPath Operator Order Precedence
The XPath EBNF grammar implies the following precedence among operators (lowest to highest):
Source: XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0 (Second Edition)
(See also: XML Path Language (XPath) 3.0)
Since //
and []
are of higher precedence than |
(union), your XPath expression
//div[@id=”myID”]|p
says
- select all
div
elements in the document with @id
attribute value
equal to myID
,
- and select all
p
elements that are children of the context element,
- and take the union of those two sets of elements
to produce the final result (as you anticipated in your second interpretation).