undefined
is technically able to be redefined, so it is not a reserved word. As a result, I usually write code in an anonymous function that forces undefined
to be an undefined variable, as so:
(function (undefined) {
"use strict";
var o = {
test: "testvalue"
};
if (o.test === undefined) {
// Do stuff here
} else {
// Do other stuff there
}
}());
However, JSLint mentions the following error:
Problem at line 1 character 15: Expected an identifier and instead saw 'undefined' (a reserved word).
Why does JSLint complain about undefined
being an reserved word, when code can arbitrarily redefine the variable? I know that you can use typeof x === "undefined"
; I just wanted to see why this method wouldn't work.
Your method does work. Just because JSLint doesn't like it doesn't make it a cardinal sin.
Try JSHint instead (for more sanity).
'undefined' was declared an immutable property of the global object in ECMA-262 Edition 5 Section 15.1.1.3, published in December 2009.
By using 'undefined' as a parameter name in a function, you are attempting to mutate it with whatever is passed to the function. So technically, the error lies with browsers being slow to adopt the standard, and JSLint is correct.
(function() { var undefined = 'foo'; console.log(undefined, typeof undefined); })();
According to MDN, it's actually not a reserved word in JavaScript and could be redefined.
undefined
is a reserved word. It's like trying to name a variable false
or true
. Your value you are passing into your function:
function(undefined) {...}
needs to be named something else, like
function(myVariable) {...}
UPDATE
Looks like it might not be actually reserved as I originally read but perhaps it's just a term that JSLint thinks should be reserved...