From a certain point I got tired of writing set conditions (and
, or
), because for more conditions or longer variable names it begins to be clumsy and annoying to write all over again. So I started writing helpers so I could write ASet.ContainsOne([ceValue1, ceValue2])
instead of (ceValue1 in ASet) or (ceValue2 in ASet)
.
type
TCustomEnum = (ceValue1, ceValue2, ceValue3);
TCustomSet = set of TCustomEnum;
TCustomSetHelper = record helper for TCustomSet
function ContainsOne(ASet: TCustomSet): Boolean;
function ContainsAll(ASet: TCustomSet): Boolean;
end;
implementation
function TCustomSetHelper.ContainsOne(ASet: TCustomSet): Boolean;
var
lValue : TCustomEnum;
begin
for lValue in ASet do
begin
if lValue in Self then
Exit(True);
end;
Result := False;
end;
function TCustomSetHelper.ContainsAll(ASet: TCustomSet): Boolean;
var
lValue : TCustomEnum;
begin
Result := True;
for lValue in ASet do
begin
if not (lValue in Self) then
Exit(False);
end;
end;
Unfortunately, this is not the most effective solution and it's against the DRY principle. To my surprise, I didn't find anyone ever dealing with the same problem, so I wonder if there is any better (generic) solution?