I know that the are some changes planned regarding case classes, like disallowing inheritance between them:
scala> case class Foo()
defined class Foo
scala> case class Bar() extends Foo()
<console>:9: warning: case class `class Bar' has case ancestor `class Foo'. Case-to-case inheritance has potentially dangerous bugs which are unlikely to be fixed. You are strongly encouraged to instead use extractors to pattern match on non-leaf nodes.
case class Bar() extends Foo()
^
defined class Bar
or case classes without parameter list (not sure about that):
scala> case class Foo
<console>:1: warning: case classes without a parameter list have been deprecated;
use either case objects or case classes with `()' as parameter list.
case class Foo
^
<console>:7: warning: case classes without a parameter list have been deprecated;
use either case objects or case classes with `()' as parameter list.
case class Foo
^
defined class Foo
What else is currently @deprecated?
Every class in Scala must have at least one non-implicit parameter section. If you don't include one, the compiler will add it for you.
scala> class X
defined class X
scala> new X()
res4: X = X@68003589
scala> class Y
defined class Y
scala> new Y()
res5: Y = Y@467f788b
Case classes are no exception. But the interaction with pattern matching is a source of confusion and bugs, which motivates the deprecation.
scala> case class A
<console>:1: warning: case classes without a parameter list have been deprecated;
use either case objects or case classes with `()' as parameter list.
case class A
^
defined class A
scala> val a = A()
a: A = A()
scala> (a: Any) match { case A => 1; case _ => 2 }
res0: Int = 2
scala> val companion = A
companion: A.type = A
scala> (companion: Any) match { case A => 1; case _ => 2 }
res0: Int = 1
As Dean suggests, it's usually better to model this with a case object.
I'm not aware of a timeline for removing support for empty-param list case classes. Case class inheritance was almost removed in 2.9.0, but that has been deferred until the next major release.
Further Reading:
Why can't the first parameter list of a class be implicit?