i want to test how my application reacts to high-dpi settings. i don't just mean 120dpi. i want to test higher dpi settings, such as:
- 150dpi
- 300dpi
- 600dpi
- 1000dpi
- 1200dpi
My development machine's video card cannot do the resolutions required to have 300dpi, (or even 150dpi for that matter).
Assuming the interface is designed to 'fit' on a display with 768 lines (e.g. 1024x768), the resolution required for the higher-dpi settings would be:
Normal Wide-Screen Frame Buffer
dpi Resolution Resolution Zoom Size (MiB)
======= ============ ============ ====== ============
96 1024 x 768 1280 x 768 100% 3.75
113 1200 x 900 1440 x 900 117% 4.96
120 1280 x 960 1536 x 960 125% 5.63
131 1400 x 1050 1680 x 1050 137% 6.73
150 1600 x 1200 1920 x 1200 156% 8.70
300 3200 x 2400 3840 x 2400 313% 35.26
600 6400 x 4800 7680 x 4800 625% 140.63
1,000 10667 x 8000 12800 x 8000 1,042% 390.63
The required resolutions get pretty high, even at 150dpi.
i was thinking of something along the line of a running the software on a VirtualPC, with the virtual machine running 6400x4800 - and then use VNC to connect to the virtual machine. It could then scale the content to fit my monitor. Although i lose the fidelity of a high-dpi display, i can at least look at it, interact with it (i.e. test it). But the s3 Trio 32/64 video card that VirtualPC emulates tops out at 1600x1200 (i.e. 150dpi).
i also wondered if maybe there is some virtual video card driver out there, that can act like a video card - capable of high-resolution, but displays itself scaled on my native desktop.
Any ideas?
References
- MSDN - How to Ensure That Your Application Displays Properly on High-DPI Displays
- MSDN: Writing High-DPI Win32 Applications
- MSDN: Tutorial: Writing High-DPI Win32 Applications
- MSDN - Pixel Density and Usability
- Engineering Windows 7 Blog: Follow-up on High DPI resolution
- Greg Schechter's Blog - High DPI Support in Windows Vista Aero
If your app's layout behaves the same at 96, 120, 144, 150 dpi then I think there's no need to test it for even higher DPI, since you will have already tested that it works well for uneven dpi increments.
Actually there are many setups high-dpi-friendly already on the market, like 1680x1050 15,4" or 1920x1080 at 16" displays in notebooks, which at 120dpi already show pixel-dependency problems and are pretty uncomfortable to work with at 96dpi already so working on higher-density display support is valid. Good for you!
Edit: I've been thinking. That may not be very real-time, but maybe if you tried handling WM_PRINT or WM_PRINTCLIENT messages in your windows and printed it to a file or at least tried to show a print preview of them using printer settings? Suddenly we're in at least 300dpi. Just an idea.
I've just tried this with VirtualBox can report the following:
- using a Windows XP host I can't really go beyond about 2000 x 2000, specifying those will simply switch back to 800x600
- using a Ubuntu 11.04 host I can go to at least 4000x4000.
Since Windows Vista introduced a new driver model, I wouldn't be suprised if Vista/Windows 7 support those high resolutions as well. Unfortunately I don't have a Vista or Windows 7 host to test this myself.
The necessary steps are the following:
You need a video card and a monitor that supports 1920 x 1200. Many users have these, and they're a joy to use if you're a developer. If you have 1600 x 1200 and don't want to spend the money on a new monitor that's fine. Beyond that, unless you're working for Pixar, I don't see the need.
As you're already aware, both the NVidia and ATI display cards allow you to create custom resolutions however never in a million years up to 12800 x 8000. Just to give you an idea of how much memory that would take ... it would require 45 times as much memory as a 1080 (1920x1200) video card. What you could do however is get a big honking rig and chain numerous cards together ... even still ... 12800 x 8000 would be something better suited for customer hardware and drivers under LINUX.
Windows doesn't check to see if your monitor actually measures to the DPI you configure it for, so just attach the biggest monitor you can and start switching the setting.
I'm curious to know why you want to test such high resolutions, i.e. anything over 192. If you have an actual need for such high resolution, surely you have access to the hardware that will be running it?
