The title says it all. I am curious why is the restrict keyword not part of C++ ? I don't know much about C++, and I'm still not able to find anything online that would give a reason blocking this. Does anyone know what terrible things would happen, if a C++ standard would use this keyword similarly to the way C does? Is it just not needed at all?
More explanation: It is not about using it, perhaps I will not have any benefit from this keyword in my whole life. This question is only about curiosity, since restrict is part of C since C99, that is 15 years.
Read this as well:
I'm interested in technical reasons, not opinions like "They just didn't like, it is not cool enough"
There are several issues in defining "restrict" in C++, some of them are listed in WG paper N3635: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3635.pdf "Towards restrict-like semantics for C++"
Some possible issues with restrict in C++ are:
- Restrict Class members and indirection with “this pointer”
- Passing of restrict qualifiers into functions, functors, lambdas, and templates
- Escaping of restrict pointer values inside functions
- Overlapping array members, strides
Document also list several C++ compilers with limited "restrict" support for C++.
There is also interesting history note in N3635 about non-inclusion of restrict to C++:
At the time of reviewing C99 feature inclusion in C++ during the Mont Tremblant meeting, restrict was considered but was waiting a paper proposal although none came forward....
Restrict is a C99 feature and was never designed to work in class abstractions and it may have to do with that pointers are not common in C++. ... it was designed for fine-grain aliasing for C, but not well-designed for type-based aliasing in C++
Not to detract from osgx's answer, but - there is a somewhat more up-to-date paper, N3998 by Finkel, Tong, Carrouth, Nelson Vandevoode and Wong, from May 2014:
Towards restrict-like aliasing semantics for C++
And an ever newer one from 2018:
[[assert: std::disjoint(A,nA, B,nB)]]: Contract assertions as an alternate
spelling of ‘restrict’
(Thanks @MCCCS for pointing the last one out.)
