Say I have a class which defines __slots__:
class Foo(object):
__slots__ = ['x']
def __init__(self, x=1):
self.x = x
# will the following work?
def __setattr__(self, key, value):
if key == 'x':
object.__setattr__(self, name, -value) # Haha - let's set to minus x
Can I define __setattr__() for it?
Since Foo has no __dict__, what will it update?
All your code does, apart from negate the value, is call the parent class __setattr__, which is exactly what would happen without your __setattr__ method. So the short answer is: Sure you can define a __setattr__.
What you cannot do is redefine __setattr__ to use self.__dict__, because instances of a class with slots do not have a __dict__ attribute. But such instances do have a self.x attribute, it's contents are just not stored in a dictionary on the instance.
Instead, slot values are stored in the same location a __dict__ instance dictionary would otherwise be stored; on the object heap. Space is reserved for len(__slots__) references, and descriptors on the class access these references on your behalf.
So, in a __setattr__ hook, you can just call those descriptors directly instead:
def __setattr__(self, key, value):
if key == 'x':
Foo.__dict__[key].__set__(self, -value)
Interesting detour: yes, on classes without a __slots__ attribute, there is a descriptor that would give you access to the __dict__ object of instances:
>>> class Bar(object): pass
...
>>> Bar.__dict__['__dict__']
<attribute '__dict__' of 'Bar' objects>
>>> Bar.__dict__['__dict__'].__get__(Bar(), Bar)
{}
which is how normal instances can look up self.__dict__. Which makes you wonder where the Bar.__dict__ object is found. In Python, it is turtles all the way down, you'd look that object up on the type object of course:
>>> type.__dict__['__dict__']
<attribute '__dict__' of 'type' objects>
>>> type.__dict__['__dict__'].__get__(Bar, type)
dict_proxy({'__dict__': <attribute '__dict__' of 'Bar' objects>, '__module__': '__main__', '__weakref__': <attribute '__weakref__' of 'Bar' objects>, '__doc__': None})
