I am making a test setup of a C static library and program.
The library code, located in a subdirectory 'foo' of my project, contains the following files:
foo/foo.c:
#include <stdio.h>
void foo(void) {
printf("something");
}
foo/foo.h:
#ifndef foo_h__
#define foo_h__
extern void foo(void);
#endif
My progam code is as follows:
test.c:
#include "foo.h"
int main() {
foo();
return 0;
}
I have a build script, called 'build', which contains the following:
build:
#!/bin/bash
gcc -c -Wall -Werror foo/foo.c
ar rcs libfoo.a foo.o
gcc -static -o test test.c libfoo.a # I have also tried -L. -lfoo
But when I run build, it gives me the following error:
test.c:1:17: fatal error: foo.h: No such file or directory
#include "foo.h"
^
Compilation terminated
It does, however, work when I omit the #include line, but I would prefer if I could use header files in my static libraries. What am I doing wrong, and how can I fix it?
Headers are not stored in libraries. Headers are stored separately from libraries. Libraries contain object files; headers are not object files. By default, standard headers on a Unix system are stored in /usr/include
— you'll normally find /usr/include/stdio.h
and /usr/include/string.h
and /usr/include/stdlib.h
, for example. By default, libraries are stored in /usr/lib
(but you may also find some in /lib
). Often, compilers are configured to look in some other places too. One common alternative location is under /usr/local
, so /usr/local/include
for headers and /usr/local/lib
for libraries. Note, too, that a single library may have many headers defining the services. The default library is an example. It has the functions corresponding to those found in <stdio.h>
, <string.h>
, <stdlib.h>
and many other headers too.
Looking at your code:
If your header file is in ./foo/foo.h
, then you need to write:
#include "foo/foo.h"
Or if you continue to use #include "foo.h"
, you need to specify where to find the header on the compiler command line with the argument:
gcc -Ifoo -o test test.c -L. -lfoo
I deliberately excluded the -static
; it's only necessary when there's a choice between a static and a shared library, but you only have libfoo.a
, so the linker will use that anyway.
Note that the problem is a compilation error, not a linking error. This would be clearer if you split the program building into two steps: (1) create test.o
and (2) link program:
gcc -c -Ifoo test.c
gcc -o test test.o -L. -lfoo
Your header guard is faulty. You originally had (but have updated the question so this typo is no longer present):
#ifndef foo_h__
#define foo_h_
You need:
#ifndef foo_h__
#define foo_h__
The macro names must be the same in both lines. Note that in this case, the misspelling is mostly harmless — but on Mac OS X, clang
(masquerading as gcc
) did give a warning about it (though I'd spotted it before I did any compilation). In some other cases, you wouldn't get the protection that the header guards are designed to provide.
./foo/foo.h:1:9: warning: 'foo_h__' is used as a header guard here, followed by #define of a
different macro [-Wheader-guard]
#ifndef foo_h__
^~~~~~~
./foo/foo.h:2:9: note: 'foo_h_' is defined here; did you mean 'foo_h__'?
#define foo_h_
^~~~~~
foo_h__
1 warning generated.
You might legitimately wonder:
- If I need
-Ifoo
when compiling test.c
, why wasn't it necessary when compiling foo/foo.c
?
Good question!
- It would not have hurt the compilation of
foo/foo.c
- GCC looks for headers in the directory where the source code of the translation unit is found (so, when compiling
foo/foo.c
, it looks in foo
directory for headers included as #include "foo.h"
anyway.
- The source file
foo/foo.c
should have included foo.h
too; it is very important that it does as that is how the compiler provides the cross-checking necessary to ensure consistency. If you had written #include "foo.h"
, the compilation would work as described. If you wrote (in foo/foo.c
) #include "foo/foo.h"
, then the command line for creating foo.o
would have needed -I.
so the header could be found.