Is it always required to bind a socket?

2020-05-27 04:39发布

问题:

Well, my question may look like a basic stuff, but i am new to network programming side. I wish to know:

1) Is it always required to bind a socket in order to receive message from that? I saw a sniffer code (raw socket) one in which directly it is invoking recvfrom and another piece of code in which it is invoking bind and then a receive.

2) What is the difference between the AF_* and PF_* family? Is the later related to POSIX? Which is the one recommended ?

回答1:

No, you don't need to bind().

If you're using a TCP or UDP socket where you are planning to either connect() or send a packet to a destination with sendto(), the kernel will automatically bind the socket to a suitable port number when you try to connect or send. This is generally the preferred way. bind()ing client sockets is considered harmful.

The same is also true of AF_UNIX sockets - the client side does not need to bind, and should not do so normally.



回答2:

I don't know about Linux, but on Windows, if recvfrom() is called on an unbound socket, it will fail with an WSAEINVAL error.



标签: c linux sockets