I'm trying to initialize an array of structures to all-0's, using the below syntax:
STRUCTA array[MAX] = {0};
However, I'm getting the following warning from gcc :
warning: missing braces around initializer
What am i doing wrong - is there another/better way to do this ?
It the first member of your struct has a scalar type, use
STRUCTA array[MAX] = {{ 0 }};
If the first member of your struct happens to be another struct object, whose first member has scalar type, then you'll have to use
STRUCTA array[MAX] = {{{ 0 }}};
and so on. Basically, you have to open a new level of nested {}
every time you "enter" another nested aggregate (a struct or an array). So in this case as long as the first member of each nested aggregate is also an aggregate, you need to go deeper with {}
.
All these extra braces are only there to avoid the warning. Of course, this is just a harmless warning (in this specific case). You can use a simple { 0 }
and it will work.
Probably the the best way to deal with this is to disable this warning entirely (see @pmg's answer for the right command-line option). Someone working on GCC wasn't thinking clearly. I mean, I understand the value of that warning (and it can indeed be very useful), but breaking the functionality of { 0 }
is unacceptable. { 0 }
should have been given special treatment.
gcc is being a nuisance. It should accept that without warnings.
Try this
STRUCTA array[MAX] = {{0}};
That gcc behaviour can be controlled with the option -Wmissing-braces
or -Wno-missing-braces
.
-Wall
enables this warning; to have -Wall
but not the missing braces, use -Wall -Wno-missing-braces
This is merely a harmful warning issued by gcc, and I would disable it with -Wno-braces
. {0}
is an extremely useful "universal zero initializer" for types whose definition your code is not supposed to be aware of, and gcc's discouraging its use is actively harmful to the pursuit of good code.
If gcc wants to keep this warning, it should at least special-case {0}
and disable the warning in this one case.
Arrays are initialized with braces, but so are structs. You probably need to put an extra set of braces around your 0 and, depending on how STRUCTA
is defined, some extra 0s separated by commas.
It depends on the STRUCTA. For example :
typedef struct structa
{
int a, b;
} STRUCTA;
int main (int argc, char const* argv[])
{
STRUCTA array[10] = {{0,0}};
return 0;
}
Can STRUCTA be assigned to 0?
You can always use memset(), too.