可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I'm trying to use react router with TypeScript. However, I have certain problems using withRouter function. On the last line, I'm getting pretty weird error:
Argument of type 'ComponentClass<{}>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'StatelessComponent<RouteComponentProps<any>> | ComponentClass<RouteComponentProps<any>>'.
Type 'ComponentClass<{}>' is not assignable to type 'ComponentClass<RouteComponentProps<any>>'.
Type '{}' is not assignable to type 'RouteComponentProps<any>'.
Property 'match' is missing in type '{}’
Code looks like:
import * as React from 'react';
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
import { RouteComponentProps, withRouter } from 'react-router-dom';
interface HomeProps extends RouteComponentProps<any> {
}
interface HomeState { }
class Home extends React.Component<HomeProps, HomeState> {
constructor(props: HomeProps) {
super(props);
}
public render(): JSX.Element {
return (<span>Home</span>);
}
}
const connectModule = connect(
(state) => ({
// Map state to props
}),
{
// Map dispatch to props
})(Home);
export default withRouter(connectModule);
回答1:
I use a different approach to fix this. I always separate the different properties (router, regular and dispatch), so I define the following interfaces for my component:
interface HomeRouterProps {
title: string; // This one is coming from the router
}
interface HomeProps extends RouteComponentProps<HomeRouterProps> {
// Add your regular properties here
}
interface HomeDispatchProps {
// Add your dispatcher properties here
}
You can now either create a new type that combines all properties in a single type, but I always combine the types during the component definition (I don't add the state here, but if you need one just go ahead). The component definition looks like this:
class Home extends React.Component<HomeProps & HomeDispatchProps> {
constructor(props: HomeProps & HomeDispatchProps) {
super(props);
}
public render() {
return (<span>{this.props.match.params.title}</span>);
}
}
Now we need to wire the component to the state via a container. It looks like this:
function mapStateToProps(state, ownProps: HomeProps): HomeProps => {
// Map state to props (add the properties after the spread)
return { ...ownProps };
}
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch): HomeDispatchProps {
// Map dispatch to props
return {};
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(Hello);
This method allows a fully typed connection, so the component and container are fully typed and it is safe to refactor it. The only thing that isn't safe for refactoring is the parameter in the route that is mapped to the HomeRouterProps
interface.
回答2:
I think it is a typescript typings compilation issue, but I've found a workaround:
interface HomeProps extends RouteComponentProps<any>, React.Props<any> {
}
回答3:
This is a Typescript typings issue. Since withRouter() will provide the routing props you need at runtime, you want to tell consumers that they only need to specify the other props. In this case, you could just use a plain ComponentClass:
export default withRouter(connectModule) as React.ComponentClass<{}>;
Or, if you had other props (defined in an interface called OwnProps) you wanted to pass in, you could do this:
export default withRouter(connectModule) as React.ComponentClass<OwnProps>;
There is slightly more discussion here
回答4:
It looks like you have the right usage to apply the match, history, and location props to your component. I would check in your node_modules
directory to see what versions of react-router
and react-router-dom
you have, as well as the @types
modules.
I have essentially the same code as you, and mine is working with the following versions:
{
"@types/react-router-dom": "^4.0.4",
"react-router-dom": "^4.1.1",
}
回答5:
After browsing the typescript definitions I discovered the RouteComponentProps
interface so I now model my containers like so
type RouteParams = {
teamId: string; // must be type string since route params
}
interface Props extends RouteComponentProps<RouteParams>, React.Props<RouteParams> { }
type State = {
players: Array<Player>;
}
export class PlayersContainer extends React.Component<Props, State>{}
now in the component class the route props can be accessed like this:
let teamid = this.props.match.params.teamId;
回答6:
The way how I'm doing this:
interface IOwnProps {
style?: CSSProperties;
}
interface INavProps {
item?: string;
}
type IProps = IOwnProps & RouteComponentProps<INavProps>;
export default class MapScreen extends PureComponent<IProps> {
...
}
回答7:
+1 for Ramon's answer. You can absolutely get full type coverage here. To add a bit - I added the call to withRouter.
interface FooProps extends RouteComponentProps<Foo> {
foo: string;
}
const Foo = ({ history, foo }: FooProps) => <span/>;
const RoutedFoo = withRouter(Foo);
my dependencies:
"@types/react-router-dom": "^4.3.0",
"typescript": "^2.9.2",