It's possible, but is it appropriate to use SHFileOperation within a Windows service? All those SHxxx API functions in shell32.dll seem to have been written with user level programs in mind. Can I be certain SHFileOperation won't display GUI ever?
问题:
回答1:
I would say, not it's not appropriate or advisable. Most of the shell32 APIs were written with a basic understanding that they would be used in interactive processes. I don't think there is any way you can guarantee that SHFileOperation will never display a UI component. In fact, if you look at IFileOperation (which is the new Vista interface that replaces SHFileOperation), it clearly states:
Exposes methods to copy, move, rename, create, and delete Shell items as well as methods to provide progress and error dialogs. This interface replaces the SHFileOperation function.
回答2:
According to the SHFILEOPTSTRUCT documentation, you can use the following flags to prevent any UI from appearing:
FOF_SILENT | FOF_NOCONFIRMATION | FOF_NOERRORUI | FOF_NOCONFIRMMKDIR
or (if you're targeting Windows Vista), FOF_NO_UI
, which is the same as the above.
Looking in the ShellAPI.h
header file in the Windows SDK, the comment against FOF_NO_UI
says "don't display any UI at all", so from this I assume it's OK to use SHFileOperation
.
回答3:
I have to agree: not appropriate or advisable.
The prinicpal reason to use SHFileOperation is to perform operations with a UI, and/or which are reversable. I.e. using SHFileOperation to delete files is going to place the files in a recycle bin rather than deleting them allowing the current interactive user to undelete, or undo the operation performed. As the services run on a non interactive desktop, no one will ever be able to clear that recycle bin out.
回答4:
I had this issue as well and working at implementing a secure and reliable network file copy between servers and network shares ( most of these shares are CIFS / NetApp filer based ) and SHFileOperation
fails from time to time.
now started using ROBOCOPY
(available by default in all Microsoft OS from Vista/Server 2008 upwards) and really looks interesting and reliable.
this has opened my eyes: https://stackoverflow.com/a/1030752/559144