Passing a constant array to a function in VB.NET

2020-04-07 06:17发布

问题:

I know that you can easily pass an array to a function, like the code below shows

Private Sub SomeFunction(ByVal PassedArray() As String)
    For i As Integer = 0 To PassedArray.Count - 1
        Debug.WriteLine(PassedArray(i))
    Next
End Sub

Public Sub Test()
    Dim MyArray As String() = {"some", "array", "members"}

    SomeFunction(MyArray)
End Sub

But is there a way to pass a constant array to a function in VB.NET?

For instance in PHP, you could write:

function SomeFunction($array)
{
    for($i=0;$i<count($array);$i++)
    {
         echo($array[$i]);
    }
}

function Test()
{
    SomeFunction(array("some", "array", "members")); // Works for PHP
}

So to reiterate: Is there a way to pass a constant array directly to a function in VB.NET? Is there any benefit in doing so? I imagine a few bytes of memory could be spared.

PS.:

SomeFunction({"some", "array", "member"}) ' This obviously gives a syntax error

回答1:

Another thing I just thought of that doesn't directly answer the question, but perhaps gets at the poster's intent - the ParamArray keyword. If you control the function you are calling into, this can make life a whole lot easier.

Public Function MyFunction(ByVal ParamArray p as String())
   ' p is a normal array in here
End Function

' This is a valid call
MyFunction(New String() {"a", "b", "c", "d"})

' So is this
MyFunction("a", "b", "c", "d")


回答2:

The closest you can do is:

SomeFunction(New String() {"some", "array", "members"})

This is actually identical in terms of objects created to what you posted. There aren't actually array literals in .NET, just helpers for initialization.



回答3:

SomeFunction({"some", "array", "member"}) ' this obviously gives a syntax error

This is a perfectly valid syntax starting with VB10 (Visual Studio 2010). See this:

  • New Features in Visual Basic 10, under Array Literals.


回答4:

No; there is no such thing as a constant array in CLI; arrays are always mutable. Perhaps a ReadOnlyCollection<T> would be suitable?

In C# (so presumably similar in VB) you can do something like:

private readonly static ReadOnlyCollection<string> fixedStrings
    = new ReadOnlyCollection<string>(
        new string[] { "apple", "banana", "tomato", "orange" });

Which gives you a static (=shared) non-editable, re-usable collection. This works especially well if the method accepts IList<T>, IEnumerable<T>, etc (rather than an array, T[]).