Within a mime header, is white space allowed between the header field-name and ':' separator? For example, are:
Content-Type: <value>
and
Content-Type : <value>
equivalent?
Also, can you please provide a pointer to the mime standard where this is described? I checked a few but did not find it.
Thanks
It isn't entirely clear whether it is or is not allowed, by the standard. However, implementations vary in how they handle whitespace between header field names and the colon. I would highly recommend avoiding whitespace there if you can.
The RFC for reference. This somewhat old article discusses the issue for HTTP headers, a similar standard.
Depends on what you mean by 'allowed'. RFCs 2822 (which obsoleted the 1982 RFC822) and 5322 (which obsoleted 2822) specifically forbid the insertion of WS between the field name and the colon (these are not 'MIME' standards, BTW). Note that : is not a token, and is only referenced as part of a field name, for example:
from = "From:" mailbox-list CRLF
However, the ancient RFC822 did allow space here, and the newer RFCs state that the obsolete syntax "MUST be accepted and parsed by a conformant receiver". The obsolete From: header definition, for example, was
obs-from = "From" *WSP ":" mailbox-list CRLF
Section 4 covers the obsolete syntax. I don't actually allow obsolete syntax in my own receiver, and I've never had a problem.
If the question is about the HTTP then the answer is "no, not allowed". See http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-21.html#rfc.section.3.2
