How to write a high performance Netty Client

问题:

I want an extremely efficient TCP client to send google protocol buffer messages. I have been using the Netty library to develop a server/client.

In tests the server seems to be able to handle up to 500k transactions per second, without to many problems, but the client tends to peak around 180k transactions per second.

I have based my client on the examples provided in the Netty documentation, but the difference is I just want to send the message and forget, I don't want a response (which most of the examples get). Is there anyway to optimize my client, so that I can achieve a higher TPS ?

Should my client maintain multiple channels, or should I be able to achieve a higher throughput than this with a single channel?

回答1:

1) If the client is only interested in sending, not in receiving, you can always disable reading from channel like below

channel.setReadable(false);

2) You can increase the throughput very easily by having multiple client channels per client, and also it can scale too.

3) and you can do following tweaks to improve the performance in general (for read/ write)

• Its better to have a SEDA like pipline by adding a EXecutionHandler with OrderdMemoryAwareThreadPoolExecutor, (with min, max channel memory with optimal value)

  bootstrap.setPipelineFactory(new ChannelPipelineFactory() {
      @Override
      public ChannelPipeline getPipeline() throws Exception {
          return Channels.pipeline(
                  executionHandler1,//sharable
                  new MessageDecoderHandler(),
                  new MessageEncoderHandler(),
                  executionHandler2,//sharable
                  new BusinessLogicHandler1(),
                  new BusinessLogicHandler2());
      }
  });
  

• Setting the writeBufferHighWaterMark of the channel to optimal value (Make sure that setting a big value will not create congestion)

  bootstrap.setOption("writeBufferHighWaterMark", 10 * 64 * 1024);

• Setting the SO_READ, SO_WRITE buffer size

  bootstrap.setOption("sendBufferSize", 1048576); bootstrap.setOption("receiveBufferSize", 1048576);

• Enabling the TCP No delay

  bootstrap.setOption("tcpNoDelay", true);

回答2:

I am not sure if "tcpNoDelay" helps to improve the throughput. Delay is there to improve the performance. None the less, I tried it and saw that the throughput actually fell more than 90%.