I read this answer from Marc Gravell (@MarcGravell): https://stackoverflow.com/a/47790712/5779732
The last line says:
As a minor optimization to your code: prefer AsList() to ToList() to avoid creating a copy.
That statement is about QueryMultiple()
which returns GridReader
.
In my understanding, System.Linq
provides an extension method IEnumerable.ToList()
. Following is from Microsoft about ToList()
.
The ToList(IEnumerable) method forces immediate query evaluation and returns a List that contains the query results. You can append this method to your query in order to obtain a cached copy of the query results.
IDbConnection.Query()
will ALWAYS return IEnumerable
or null
. Null-check could be easily done in calling code. What difference does AsList
makes then?
If my understanding is correct, AsList
will always internally call ToList
which will create a copy.
Considering this, is AsList()
better than ToList()
with IDbConnection.Query()
which returns IEnumerable
? If yes; why?
What is that AsList()
does internally that makes it a better choice in this case?
AsList
is a custom Dapper extension method. All it does is checks if IEnumerable<T>
you pass to it is really List<T>
. If it is - it returns it back, just casts to List<T>
. If it's not - it calls regular ToList
. The point is - ToList()
always creates a copy, even if what you pass to it is already a list. AsList()
method avoids doing this copy, and so is useful if such copy is unnecessary.
In this specific scenario, you have the following code:
multipleresult.Read<MerchantProduct>()
where multipleresult
is GridReader
. Read
has buffered
argument which is true by default. When its true - Read
will really return List<T>
, so by calling ToList
you will copy that list again without much reason.
The same is true for IDbConnection.Query()
- is also has buffered
parameter, which is true by default, so it will also by default return List<T>
.
If you prefer to use ToList()
- you can pass buffered: false
to Query()
or Read()
to avoid creating that additional copy.
This extension is a custom dapper extension which does an additional check before calling ToList
. Source:
public static List<T> AsList<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source)
=> (source == null || source is List<T>) ? (List<T>)source : source.ToList();
ToList
always creates a new List<T>
instance and fills it with the given items
AsList
checks if the sequence is already a List<T>
, then it will just cast it
Of course this approach can be more efficient because casting something is much less work than creating and filling something new. So it's completely different.
This is kind of opinion based, but i find this dangerous. Someone might overlook the AsList
and reads ToList
or just don't know the difference. It's dangerous if someone changes the code later.
So for example a method that takes IEnumerable<T>
which uses AsList
:
public static List<T> GetResult<T>(IEnumerable<T> seq)
{
if(some condition here)
{
seq = seq.Where(some predicate here);
}
return seq.AsList()
}
Now code called this method with a list:
IEnumerable<string> sequence = (gets a list from somewhere)
List<string> userList = GetResult(sequence);
Later someone decides that an array is more appropriate here:
IEnumerable<string> sequence = (gets an array from somewhere)
List<string> userList = GetResult(sequence);
This doesn't really hurt until now. Now a new List is initialized and filled because the source is not a list and can't be casted. So it's just less efficient. But if the logic also relied on the list being the same reference, this won't work anymore.
if(userList == seq)
{
// do something
}
This is always false
once the array is used . So the code was broken silently.
To cut a long story short: i don't like the AsList
method. You can always check the type yourself.