可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I need to select only the first row from a query that joins tables A and B. On table B exist multiple records with same name. There are not identifiers in any of the two tables. I cannot change the scheme either because I do not own the DB.
TABLE A
NAME
TABLE B
NAME
DATA1
DATA2
Select Distinct A.NAME,B.DATA1,B.DATA2
From A
Inner Join B on A.NAME = B.NAME
This gives me
NAME DATA1 DATA2
sameName 1 2
sameName 1 3
otherName 5 7
otherName 8 9
but I need to retrieve only one row per name
NAME DATA1 DATA2
sameName 1 2
otherName 5 7
I was able to do this by adding the result into a temp table with a identity column and then select the minimum id per name.
The problem here is that I require to do this in one single statement.
回答1:
This will work:
with temp as (
select A.NAME, B.DATA1, B.DATA2,
row_number() over (partition by A.NAME order by A.NAME) as rownum
from TABLEA A inner join TABLEB B
on A.NAME = B.NAME
)
select NAME, DATA1, DATA2 from temp where rownum = 1
If you want to select the least value of data1 and within it data2, then use this variation:
with temp as (
select A.NAME, B.DATA1, B.DATA2,
row_number() over (partition by A.NAME order by B.DATA1, B.DATA2) as rownum
from TABLEA A inner join TABLEB B
on A.NAME = B.NAME
)
select NAME, DATA1, DATA2 from temp where rownum = 1
Both the queries will give one row per name.
回答2:
Using a GROUP BY may get you part way there, but beware. If you do something like this:
Select A.NAME, min(B.DATA1), min(B.DATA2)
From A Inner Join B on A.NAME = B.NAME
Group by A.NAME;
You will get the result you are looking for:
NAME DATA1 DATA2
sameName 1 2
otherName 5 7
But only because of the data you are testing with. If you change the data, so that instead of:
otherName 8 9
you had:
otherName 8 4
It would return:
NAME DATA1 DATA2
sameName 1 2
otherName 5 4
Note that otherName does not return DATA1 and DATA2 from the same record!
Update: A self-join with a comparison on one of the data values may help you, such as:
SELECT a.*, b.* FROM a,b
LEFT JOIN b b2 ON b.name = b2.name AND b.data2 < b2.data2
WHERE a.name = b.name AND b2.data2 IS NOT NULL;
However, this will only work if the values in DATA2 are unique per NAME.
回答3:
Not sure if this will solve your problem or not, but you could try using the GROUP BY clause and group by one of the name columns.
DB2 Group by tutorial
回答4:
If you can add to a temp table and then query from that, you can do it in one go.
WITH T AS (temp table select), RN AS (select min row-numbers from T) SELECT T.NAME, T.DATA1, T.DATA2 FROM T INNER JOIN RN on T.row_number = RN.row_number
There are many other ways to write this, but that's how I've been doing similar things.
回答5:
Try to dedupe B like this
SELECT A.NAME, bb.DATA1, bb.DATA2
FROM A
JOIN B bb
ON A.NAME = B.NAME
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT *
FROM B
WHERE NAME = bb.NAME
AND (DATA1 > bb.DATA1
OR DATA1 = bb.DATA1 AND DATA2 > bb.DATA2))
Add more OR clauses if more DATAx columns exist.
If A contains duplicates too, simply use DISTINCT as in the OP.
回答6:
SELECT A.NAME, bb.DATA1, bb.DATA2
From A Inner Join B on A.NAME = B.NAME
WHERE B.DATA1 = (SELECT MIN(DATA1) FROM B WHERE NAME = A.NAME)
This will give your desired result, providing B.DATA1 values are unique within the set relating to table A.
If they're not unique, the only other way I know is using CROSS APPLY in MSSQL 2005 and above.
回答7:
You can use row number to get one row for each name, try something like below
Select name,data1,data2 from
(Select A.NAME,B.DATA1,B.DATA2,row_number() over(partitioj by a.name order by a.name) rn
From A
Inner Join B on A.NAME = B.NAME) where rn=1
回答8:
The tag of this question indicates that it would be a solution for DB2, but this is very similar to MS-SQL server, if so try these solutions:
Using CROSS, it will be possible to display what exists only in both tables
select A.*, B.DATA1, B.DATA2
from A
cross apply (select top 1 * from B where B.name = A.name) B
But it is possible to change to OUTER to display what exists in A without the obligation to exist in B
select A.*, B.DATA1, B.DATA2
from A
OUTER apply (select top 1 * from B where B.name = A.name) B
In the structure of the apply statement, it would also be possible to include an ORDER statement, since there is no indication of the order of exits in table B