After upgrading to Xcode 9.3 (9E145) my App showed some unexpected behavior. It seems that the issue is with a cast of an NSNumber to a Float. I use the as
type cast operator for this. See the following example.
let n = NSNumber.init(value: 1.12)
let m = NSNumber.init(value: 1.00)
let x = n as? Float
let y = m as? Float
let xd = n as? Double
let z = Float(truncating: n)
Here, the first cast fails, i.e. x == nil
. The second cast succeeds and the instantiation of a Float with the init:truncating
constructor also succeeds, i.e. z == 1.12
. The cast of n to a Double succeeds, which, to me, makes no sense at all.
Can anyone explain this behavior to me? I.e. can anyone give me a good reason why the cast of n to a Float fails? Is this a bug? If this is intended behavior, can you please reference the location in the Swift documentation that describes this?
This is a consequence of SE-0170 NSNumber bridging and Numeric types, implemented in Swift 4:
as?
for NSNumber
should mean "Can I safely express the value stored in this opaque box called a NSNumber as the value I want?".
1.12
is a floating point literal, and inferred as a Double
, so NSNumber(value: 1.12)
is “boxing” the 64-bit floating point value
closest to 1.12
. Converting that to a 32-bit Float
does not
preserve this value:
let n = NSNumber(value: 1.12)
let x = Float(truncating: n) // Or: let x = n.floatValue
let nn = NSNumber(value: x)
print(n == nn) // false
On the other hand, 1.0
can be represented exactly as a Float
:
let m = NSNumber(value: 1.0)
let y = m.floatValue
let mm = NSNumber(value: y)
print(m == mm) // true
and that is why casting m as? Float
succeeds. Both
n.floatValue
Float(truncating: n)
can be used to ”truncate” the number to the closest representable
32-bit floating point value.