可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
When I get exceptions, it is often from deep within the call stack. When this happens, more often than not, the actual offending line of code is hidden from me:
tmp.rb:7:in `t': undefined method `bar' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
from tmp.rb:10:in `s'
from tmp.rb:13:in `r'
from tmp.rb:16:in `q'
from tmp.rb:19:in `p'
from tmp.rb:22:in `o'
from tmp.rb:25:in `n'
from tmp.rb:28:in `m'
from tmp.rb:31:in `l'
... 8 levels...
from tmp.rb:58:in `c'
from tmp.rb:61:in `b'
from tmp.rb:64:in `a'
from tmp.rb:67
That "... 8 levels..." truncation is causing me a great deal of trouble. I'm not having much success googling for this one: How do I tell ruby that I want dumps to include the full stack?
回答1:
Exception#backtrace has the entire stack in it:
def do_division_by_zero; 5 / 0; end
begin
do_division_by_zero
rescue => exception
puts exception.backtrace
raise # always reraise
end
(Inspired by Peter Cooper's Ruby Inside blog)
回答2:
You could also do this if you'd like a simple one-liner:
puts caller
回答3:
This produces the error description and nice clean, indented stacktrace:
begin
# Some exception throwing code
rescue => e
puts "Error during processing: #{$!}"
puts "Backtrace:\n\t#{e.backtrace.join("\n\t")}"
end
回答4:
IRB has a setting for this awful "feature", which you can customize.
Create a file called ~/.irbrc
that includes the following line:
IRB.conf[:BACK_TRACE_LIMIT] = 100
This will allow you to see 100 stack frames in irb
, at least. I haven't been able to find an equivalent setting for the non-interactive runtime.
Detailed information about IRB customization can be found in the Pickaxe book.
回答5:
One liner for callstack:
begin; Whatever.you.want; rescue => e; puts e.message; puts; puts e.backtrace; end
One liner for callstack without all the gems's:
begin; Whatever.you.want; rescue => e; puts e.message; puts; puts e.backtrace.grep_v(/\/gems\//); end
One liner for callstack without all the gems's and relative to current directory
begin; Whatever.you.want; rescue => e; puts e.message; puts; puts e.backtrace.grep_v(/\/gems\//).map { |l| l.gsub(`pwd`.strip + '/', '') }; end
回答6:
This mimics the official Ruby trace, if that's important to you.
begin
0/0 # or some other nonsense
rescue => e
puts e.backtrace.join("\n\t")
.sub("\n\t", ": #{e}#{e.class ? " (#{e.class})" : ''}\n\t")
end
Amusingly, it doesn't handle 'unhandled exception' properly, reporting it as 'RuntimeError', but the location is correct.
回答7:
I was getting these errors when trying to load my test environment (via rake test or autotest) and the IRB suggestions didn't help. I ended up wrapping my entire test/test_helper.rb in a begin/rescue block and that fixed things up.
begin
class ActiveSupport::TestCase
#awesome stuff
end
rescue => e
puts e.backtrace
end
回答8:
[examine all threads backtraces to find the culprit]
Even fully expanded call stack can still hide the actual offending line of code from you when you use more than one thread!
Example: One thread is iterating ruby Hash, other thread is trying to modify it. BOOM! Exception! And the problem with the stack trace you get while trying to modify 'busy' hash is that it shows you chain of functions down to the place where you're trying to modify hash, but it does NOT show who's currently iterating it in parallel (who owns it)! Here's the way to figure that out by printing stack trace for ALL currently running threads. Here's how you do this:
# This solution was found in comment by @thedarkone on https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/24627
rescue Object => boom
thread_count = 0
Thread.list.each do |t|
thread_count += 1
err_msg += "--- thread #{thread_count} of total #{Thread.list.size} #{t.object_id} backtrace begin \n"
# Lets see if we are able to pin down the culprit
# by collecting backtrace for all existing threads:
err_msg += t.backtrace.join("\n")
err_msg += "\n---thread #{thread_count} of total #{Thread.list.size} #{t.object_id} backtrace end \n"
end
# and just print it somewhere you like:
$stderr.puts(err_msg)
raise # always reraise
end
The above code snippet is useful even just for educational purposes as it can show you (like x-ray) how many threads you actually have (versus how many you thought you have - quite often those two are different numbers ;)
回答9:
You can also use backtrace Ruby gem (I'm the author):
require 'backtrace'
begin
# do something dangerous
rescue StandardError => e
puts Backtrace.new(e)
end