Why is this legal in PHP?
<?php
class Foo {
public function test() {
echo "hello\n";
}
}
Foo::test();
?>
test() is a non-static function but I can access it without an instance.
Why is this legal in PHP?
<?php
class Foo {
public function test() {
echo "hello\n";
}
}
Foo::test();
?>
test() is a non-static function but I can access it without an instance.
I believe it's because of backwards compatibility. In PHP4 you didn't have the static keyword for methods (still looking for reference, but so far this is all I've found http://us2.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.static.php). This way, PHP4 code can still run without a problem.
It is better practice to declare your static functions as such and if you turn on E_STRICT you'll see a notice about this.
error_reporting(E_ALL | E_STRICT);
Update: well, this is the best I've found http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34990 and http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47891.
It's legal, but generally frowned upon, until you reference $this
in your statically called method which will throw a fatal error.
From the PHP Manual:
Calling non-static methods statically generates an E_STRICT level warning.
This works because you have not enabled the E_STRICT error level. Once enabled PHP will stop letting you to do this.
I don't believe that you can access a method of a class with out a instance of the object.