Distributed Map in Scala Spark

2020-02-10 15:18发布

问题:

Does Spark support distributed Map collection types ?

So if I have an HashMap[String,String] which are key,value pairs , can this be converted to a distributed Map collection type ? To access the element I could use "filter" but I doubt this performs as well as Map ?

回答1:

Since I found some new info I thought I'd turn my comments into an answer. @maasg already covered the standard lookup function I would like to point out you should be careful because if the RDD's partitioner is None, lookup just uses a filter anyway. In reference to the (K,V) store on top of spark it looks like this is in progress, but a usable pull request has been made here. Here is an example usage.

import org.apache.spark.rdd.IndexedRDD

// Create an RDD of key-value pairs with Long keys.
val rdd = sc.parallelize((1 to 1000000).map(x => (x.toLong, 0)))
// Construct an IndexedRDD from the pairs, hash-partitioning and indexing
// the entries.
val indexed = IndexedRDD(rdd).cache()

// Perform a point update.
val indexed2 = indexed.put(1234L, 10873).cache()
// Perform a point lookup. Note that the original IndexedRDD remains
// unmodified.
indexed2.get(1234L) // => Some(10873)
indexed.get(1234L) // => Some(0)

// Efficiently join derived IndexedRDD with original.
val indexed3 = indexed.innerJoin(indexed2) { (id, a, b) => b }.filter(_._2 != 0)
indexed3.collect // => Array((1234L, 10873))

// Perform insertions and deletions.
val indexed4 = indexed2.put(-100L, 111).delete(Array(998L, 999L)).cache()
indexed2.get(-100L) // => None
indexed4.get(-100L) // => Some(111)
indexed2.get(999L) // => Some(0)
indexed4.get(999L) // => None

It seems like the pull request was well received and will probably be included in future versions of spark, so it is probably safe to use that pull request in your own code. Here is the JIRA ticket in case you were curious



回答2:

The quick answer: Partially.

You can transform a Map[A,B] into an RDD[(A,B)] by first forcing the map into a sequence of (k,v) pairs but by doing so you loose the constrain that keys of a map must be a set. ie. you loose the semantics of the Map structure.

From a practical perspective, you can still resolve an element into its corresponding value using kvRdd.lookup(element) but the result will be a sequence, given that you have no warranties that there's a single lookup value as explained before.

A spark-shell example to make things clear:

val englishNumbers = Map(1 -> "one", 2 ->"two" , 3 -> "three")
val englishNumbersRdd = sc.parallelize(englishNumbers.toSeq)

englishNumbersRdd.lookup(1)
res: Seq[String] = WrappedArray(one) 

val spanishNumbers = Map(1 -> "uno", 2 -> "dos", 3 -> "tres")
val spanishNumbersRdd = sc.parallelize(spanishNumbers.toList)

val bilingueNumbersRdd = englishNumbersRdd union spanishNumbersRdd

bilingueNumbersRdd.lookup(1)
res: Seq[String] = WrappedArray(one, uno)