可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I have a method which depends on new Date
to create a date object and then manipulates it. I'm testing that the manipulation works as expected, so I need to compare the returned date with expected date. In order to do that I need to make sure that new Date
returns the same value in the test and in the method being tested. How can I do that?
Is there a way to actually mock the return value of a constructor function?
I could create a module that can be required with a function that provides a date object and can be mocked. But that seems like an unnecessary abstraction in my code.
an example function to be tested...
module.exports = {
sameTimeTomorrow: function(){
var dt = new Date();
dt.setDate(dt + 1);
return dt;
}
};
how do I mock the return value of new Date()
?
回答1:
You can use jasmine's spyOn (jest is built on jasmine) to mock Date's prototype for getDate as follows:
spyOn(Date.prototype, 'setDate').and.returnValue(DATE_TO_TEST_WITH);
SpyOn will also clean up after it's self and only lasts for the scope of the test.
回答2:
You can override Date constructor with an mocked function which returns your a constructed Date object with a date value you specified:
var yourModule = require('./yourModule')
test('Mock Date', () => {
const mockedDate = new Date(2017, 11, 10)
const originalDate = Date
global.Date = jest.fn(() => mockedDate)
global.Date.setDate = originalDate.setDate
expect(yourModule.sameTimeTomorrow().getDate()).toEqual(11)
})
You can test the example here: https://repl.it/@miluoshi5/jest-mock-date
回答3:
You can mock a constructor like new Date() using jest.spyOn
as below:
test('mocks a constructor like new Date()', () => {
console.log('Normal: ', new Date().getTime())
const mockDate = new Date(1466424490000)
const spy = jest
.spyOn(global, 'Date')
.mockImplementation(() => mockDate)
console.log('Mocked: ', new Date().getTime())
spy.mockRestore()
console.log('Restored: ', new Date().getTime())
})
And the output looks like:
Normal: 1566424897579
Mocked: 1466424490000
Restored: 1566424897608
回答4:
You can replace the Date constructor with something that always returns a hardcoded date, and then put it back to normal when done.
var _Date = null;
function replaceDate() {
if (_Date) {
return
};
_Date = Date;
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(Date).forEach(function(name) {
_Date[name] = Date[name]
});
// set Date ctor to always return same date
Date = function() { return new _Date('2000-01-01T00:00:00.000Z') }
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(_Date).forEach(function(name) {
Date[name] = _Date[name]
});
}
function repairDate() {
if (_Date === null) {
return;
}
Date = _Date;
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(_Date).forEach(function(name) {
Date[name] = _Date[name]
});
_Date = null;
}
// test that two dates created at different times return the same timestamp
var t0 = new Date();
// create another one 100ms later
setTimeout(function() {
var t1 = new Date();
console.log(t0.getTime(), t1.getTime(), t0.getTime() === t1.getTime());
// put things back to normal when done
repairDate();
}, 100);
回答5:
I just wrote a jest test and was able to stub new Date()
with global.Date = () => now
回答6:
Here's what I'm doing now and this is working and doesn't clutter my method's signature.
newDate.js
module.exports = function(){
return new Date();
};
someModule.js
var newDate = require('newDate.js');
module.exports = {
sameTimeTomorrow: function(){
var dt = newDate();
dt.setDate(dt.getDate() + 1);
return dt;
}
};
someModule-test.js
jest.dontMock('someModule.js');
describe('someModule', function(){
it('sameTimeTomorrow', function(){
var newDate = require('../../_app/util/newDate.js');
newDate.mockReturnValue(new Date(2015, 02, 13, 09, 15, 40, 123));
var someModule = require('someModule.js');
expect(someModule.sameTimeTomorrow().toString()).toBe(new Date(2015, 02, 14, 09, 15, 40, 123).toString());
});
});