Why push method is significantly slower than putti

问题:

I pretty don't understand why this test :

http://jsperf.com/push-method-vs-setting-via-key

Shows that

 a.push(Math.random());

is over ten times slower than

 a[i] = Math.random();

Could you explain why this is the case ? What magic "push" do that make it so slow ? (or so slow compared to other valid method of doing that).

EDIT

NOTE: The push test is biased. I increase size of the array every iteration! Read carefully accepted answer!

回答1:

Could you explain why this is the case?

Because your test is flawed. The push does always append to the existing a array making it much larger, while the second test does only use the first 1000 indices. Using the setup is not enough here, you would have to reset the a array before every for-loop: http://jsperf.com/push-method-vs-setting-via-key/3.

Apart from that, the method call to push might have a little overhead, and determining the current array length might need additional time compared to using the index of the for-loop.

Usually there is no reason not to use push - the method is there for exactly that operation and makes some code easier to read. While a few people think one version is faster than the other, both are equally optimized in browsers. See Why is array.push sometimes faster than array[n] = value? and Using the push method or .length when adding to array? - results vary so wide that it's actually irrelevant. Use what is better to understand.

回答2:

That's simply because Google decided to put more work into optimising array indexing than optimising the push method in Chrome.

If you look at the test results now that a few more people have tried it, you see that the performance differes quite a lot between different browsers, and even between different versions of the same browser.

Nowadays browsers compile the Javascript code, which means that the browser turns the code into something that is much faster to run that interpreted Javascript. What the compiler does with the code determines how different ways of doing things performs. Different compilers optimise certain things better, which gives the different preformances.

回答3:

Because the .push() is a function call and the other is direct assignment. Direct assignment is always faster.

Remember that in javascript, arrays are objects like everything else. This means you can assign properties directly to them.

In the special case of arrays, they have a built-in length property that gets update behind the scenes (and lots of other optimizations under the hood, but that's not important right now).

In a regular object, you can do this but its not an array:

var x = {
   0: 'a',
   1: 'b',
   2: 'c'
};

However, since arrays and hashes are both objects, this is equivalent.

   var x = [
      'a',
      'b',
      'c'
   ];

Since x is an array in the second case, length is automatically calculated and available.