How can I do a bugfix on master and integrate it i

问题:

I'm using Git for one of my projects at the moment, and I love it.

However, because I'm the only one working on my project, the only commands I've been using are

git status
git add .
git commit -m 'message here'
git push origin master

I have pushed the project to remote a long time ago ago (I Capistrano for deployment), and all is working great.

Now I want to change the design of the site, but keep the logic intact. I'm guessing I need to create a new branch (let's call it newdesign) for that.

What I'm wondering, though, is this: if I'm working on the newdesign branch, and I see a bug in the master branch, how can I fix the bug on master and then integrate that bugfix in the newdesign branch, so that the latter be kept up to date with the actual logic?

回答1:

This is a classic case in which you can take advantage of Git branches. Here is the workflow you should use.

Let's say you've created a develop branch stemming from master and you've made a few commits on that branch:

Suddenly, you realise that there is a bug on master, a bug which you need to fix quickly. Instead of working directly off of master, you should create a short-lived bug-fix branch, to isolate the bug-fixing task from your master branch:

git checkout master
git checkout -b bugfix

After making one commit (or more) on the bugfix branch to fix the problem,

you should make sure that everything works as it should (run tests, etc.). When you're happy with the state of your code on bugfix, merge it into master:

git checkout master
git merge bugfix

At that stage, you can push your (now fixed) master branch to remote, and delete the bugfix branch:

git push origin master
git branch -d bugfix

Now, to integrate the latest changes on master into develop, you basically have two options.

1. Merge master into develop, by running:

   git checkout develop
   git merge master
   

   

2. Alternatively, rebase develop on top of master, by running:

   git checkout develop
   git rebase master
   

   

In either case, your develop branch will now contain the fix, and you can resume work on develop.

回答2:

let's suppose you have you master and dev branches.

You work on dev for your new features and you do your fix on master.

Then you checkout dev and merge master into dev. This way master is fixed and dev can profit from the fix you made AND keeps it's own history.

Alternatively, you can rebase dev on top of branch. This gives you a "cleaner" history in the sense that you don't have merge points.

See the git guide about merging: http://git-scm.com/docs/git-merge