how do arrays work internally in c/c++

问题:

I was wondering how do arrays work in c. I end up with an hypothesis and I'd like to know if I am right or not.

We know arrays are a sequence of adjacent memory cases(boxes), where each box has the size of the type it stocks (i.e if INTs one box has a size = sizeof(int) and an array of 3 INTs takes in memory adjacent places of 3 sizeof(int) )

Now we also know that we can dynamically allocate memory for an array of a certain type (malloc in C, new in C++).

what makes me wonder is the fact that an array has for origin the the address of the first box of the array and the first value (the value in the later box) when calling it with the bracket [0] is array[0] == *(array+0) == *array (whether array was declared "type * array" or "type array[]" or "type array[size]") and "array" called that way whether define as a pointer or an array ("type * array" or "type array[]" or "type array[size]") is the address of the first box.

I end up thinking and I'd like a confirmation on this: arrays when even declared with the square brackets ([]) are actually in memory a sequence of n pointers each containing (having as a value not as an address) the address of a memory box Bi containing the actual value + those memory boxes (B0,...,Bn each containing the actual values). such that in the and when one declares "int array[5]" the program actually allocate 5 adjacent boxes of int pointers P0,P1,..,P4 and 5 int sized memory places scattered all over the computer memory B0,B1,...,B4 where the value of Pi is the address of Bi

Am I right or wrong!!?? Thank you!

回答1:

arrays when even declared with the square brackets ([]) are actually in memory a sequence of n pointers each containing [...] the address of a memory box Bi containing the actual value + those memory boxes

Nope.

It sounds like you're puzzled how array[0] == *(array+0) == *array could be true both for an array declared as int array[10]; and int *array = ...;. A perfectly reasonable question; We're told that for a pointer ptr the expression *ptr gets the value the pointer is pointing at, so when we use the same syntax with an array where are the addresses that we're dereferencing?

Here's the secret: The array index operator ([]) does not work on arrays in C and C++. When you apply it to an array the language implicitly converts the array into a pointer to the array's first element. Thus adding to an array or dereferencing an array appears to behave the same as adding or dereferencing a pointer.

int array[10];

// These lines do exactly the same thing:
int *ptr1 = &array[0]; // explicitly get address of first element
int *ptr2 = array;     // implicitly get address of first element

So arrays really are a contiguous set of elements in memory where each element really is the value, not a pointer to another location containing the value. It's just that the way arrays are defined means that they often convert to a pointer implicitly and so it seems like there are pointers when really there's just an implicit conversion.

回答2:

Arrays are stored contiguously in the virtual memory. However, the physical memory addresses that they map to may or may not be contiguous.

And the array elements do not store a pointer to point to the next element. Only the value is stored.

回答3:

Think of it as this:

array[n] is simply a syntactic sugar for *(array + n).

And no, there are no pointers, the array actually contains the values in a continuos memory range.