Does GCC inline C++ functions without the 'inl

2020-01-29 06:20发布

问题:

Does GCC, when compiling C++ code, ever try to optimize for speed by choosing to inline functions that are not marked with the inline keyword?

回答1:

Yes. Any compiler is free to inline any function whenever it thinks it is a good idea. GCC does that as well.

At -O2 optimization level the inlining is done when the compiler thinks it is worth doing (a heuristic is used) and if it will not increase the size of the code. At -O3 it is done whenever the compiler thinks it is worth doing, regardless of whether it will increase the size of the code. Additionally, at all levels of optimization (enabled optimization that is), static functions that are called only once are inlined.

As noted in the comments below, these -Ox are actually compound settings that envelop multiple more specific settings, including inlining-related ones (like -finline-functions and such), so one can also describe the behavior (and control it) in terms of those more specific settings.



回答2:

Yes, especially if you have a high level of optimizations enabled.

There is a flag you can provide to the compiler to disable this: -fno-inline-functions.



回答3:

If you use '-finline-functions' or '-O3' it will inline functions. You can also use '-finline_limit=N' to tune how much inlining it does.



回答4:

Yes, it does, although it will also generate a non-inlined function body for non-static non-inline functions as this is needed for calls from other translation units.

For inline functions, it is an error to fail to provide a function body if the function is used in any particular translation unit so this isn't a problem.