可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I've got HTML code like this:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1251" />
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<table style="width:100%;">
<tr>
<td>
<table style="width:100%; max-width:1000px; background:#000099;">
<tr>
<td>
001
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
The problem is that Chrome and Safari are ignoring "max-width:1000px"
My friend has found that we can prevent it by adding "display:block"
for the inner table, and it's somehow working.
So, what I want to know is - are there any other ways of solving this problem and why is this happening?
回答1:
Max-width applies to block elements. <table>
is neither block nor inline. Ambiguous enough? haha. You can use display:block; max-width:1000px
and forget about width:100%
. Chrome and Safari follow the rules!
Edit May 2017: please note, this comment was made 7 years ago (in 2010!). I suspect browsers have changed a bunch over the years (I wouldn't know, I no longer do web design). I recommend using a more recent solution.
回答2:
I know this has been answered for a while and with a working workaround, but the answer stating that max-width
only applies to block elements and citing a source that's not the spec is completely incorrect.
The spec (the CSS 3 spec for CSS Intrinsic & Extrinsic Sizing refers to the CSS 2.1 spec on this rule) clearly states:
all elements but non-replaced inline elements, table rows, and row groups
which would mean it should apply to table elements.
It means that WebKit's behavior of not honoring max-width
or min-width
on table elements is incorrect.
回答3:
I think what you're looking for here is:
table-layout: fixed
Apply this style to the table and your table will respect the width you assign to it.
Note: Applying this style directly in Chrome
will look like it is not working. You need to apply the style in your CSS / HTML
file and refresh the page.
回答4:
Wrap inner table with div and set max-width to this wrapping div.
回答5:
I had the same issue. I used a table as a means to center my content on the page, but safari ignored width:100%; max-width:1200px
as a style I applied to the table. I learned that if I wrap the table in a div and set left and right margins on auto on the div, it would center on the page and obey the max and min width attributes in safari and firefox on the mac. I have yet to check explorer or chrome on windows. Here is an example:
<div style="position:relative; width:100%; max-width:1200px; min-width:800px; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto">
Then I nested the table inside the div...
<table width="100%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
回答6:
I just came across this answer and it is worth noting that according to MDN (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/max-width), their compatibility table for max-width says:
| Feature | Chrome | Firefox (Gecko) | Internet Explorer | Opera | Safari (WebKit) |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|applies to <table> [1]| Not supported | (Yes) | Not supported | (Yes) | Not supported |
"[1] CSS 2.1 explicitly leaves the behavior of max-width with undefined. Therefore any behavior is CSS2.1-compliant; newer CSS specifications may define this behavior, so Web developers shouldn't rely on a specific one now."
There is some cool stuff on MDN though such as "fill-available" and "fit-content" - we have some things to look forward to when the spec stabilises and is explicit on this front...
回答7:
I was able to fix my problem with media query:
I replaced
max-width: 360px
with
@media (min-width: 440px) {
width: 360px;
}
回答8:
Here is an unambiguous reference: 10 Visual formatting model details (w3.org)
In CSS 2.1, the effect of 'min-width' and 'max-width' on tables, inline tables, table cells, table columns, and column groups is undefined.
References given previously in this thread, erroneously read “table rows” as “table”. This one however, really says “table”. That's part of CSS2, but CSS3 refers to CSS2 for the basis of max-width
.
So it's just undefined and browser are free to do what they wish and it's unsafe to rely on it.