Mvvm model ViewModel

问题:

It can be named MVVM model or not? Because View interacts with DataModel through ViewModelData. Does View should interact only with ViewModelData? I did read somewhere that right MVVM model should implement INotify in ViewModel not in Model. Is it right?

namespace WpfApplication135
{
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for MainWindow.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{

    public MainWindow()
    {
        InitializeComponent();
        DataContext = new ViewModelData();
    }
}
public class ViewModelData
{
    public DataModel DM { get; set; }
    public ViewModelData()
    {
        DM = new DataModel();
    }
}
public class DataModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    public int label;
    public int Label
    {
        get
        {
            return label;
        }

        set
        {
            label = value;
            RaisePropertyChanged("Label");
        }
    }
    public DataModel()
    {
        Action Update = new Action(Run);
        IAsyncResult result = Update.BeginInvoke(null, null);
    }
    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
    private void RaisePropertyChanged(string info)
    {
        if (PropertyChanged != null)
            PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(info));
    }
    public void Run()
    {
        int i=0;
        while(true)
        {
            System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(2000);
            Label = ++i;
        }
    }
}
}

xaml

    <Grid>
    <Label Content="{Binding DM.Label}" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="10,10,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top"/>

</Grid>

回答1:

The initial thought for MVVM was indeed that the View should not know (not depend on) the Model.

In practice this meant re-implementing all those Model properties in the ViewModel (see the light-yellow box in the picture below), a lot of work. And extra painful when your Model can easily implement INPC, for example when it is generated from a database schema. Entity Framework in database-first mode lets you inject the INPC code through the T4 templates.

The consensus quickly became that it is OK to forward a ViewModel.Model property and bind to that, just like your DM property. See the light-blue box in the picture.

The issue is visualized well in this picture, note the large number of arrows in the top right corner. They depict the various solutions for databinding and you can use any combination of them.

回答2:

One point of MVVM is that your view should not know your data model and vice versa. That's why there is a ViewModel. Right now, your ViewModel is wasted code. It does nothing.

You may want to read up on MVVM a bit more, because explaining it is way too broad for the Q&A format here.