This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
LINQ to SQL: Return anonymous type?
I have a standard LINQ to SQL query, which returns the data as an anonymous type (containing about 6 columns of data of various datatypes).
I would like to make this returned object available to other parts of the program, either by returning it to the method-caller, or by assigning it to a property of the object containing the method.
How can I do this given that it is an anonymous type ("var")?
EDIT - Here is the code:
using (ormDataContext context = new ormDataContext(connStr))
{
var electionInfo = from t1 in context.elections
join t2 in context.election_status
on t1.statusID equals t2.statusID
select new { t1, t2 };
}
Make the anonymous type into a class...
public class Person
{
public Person() {
}
public String Name { get; set; }
public DateTime DOB { get; set; }
}
Person p =
from person in db.People
where person.Id = 1
select new Person {
Name = person.Name,
DOB = person.DateOfBirth
}
You cannot type any method in C# to be the explicit type of an anonymous types. They cannot be "named" so to speak and hence cannot appear in metadata signatures.
If you really want to return a value which is an anonymous type there are 2 options
- Have the return type of the method be System.Object. You can then do evil casting hacks to get a typed value in another method. This is very fragile and I don't recommend it.
- Use a generic method and a type inference trick to get the return type correct. This would require a very interesting signature definition for your approach.
Anonymous types were not really meant to be passed around in this fashion. At the point you need to pass them around between your functions in this manner, you're better off explicitly defining a type.
Using var doesn't make it an anonymous type. Using var just means let this variable be of the type available on the right-hand side of the assignment. It's just short hand. If the thing on the right-hand side is a real class, the variable will be of that type.
For example:
var person = new Person { Name = "bob" };
The person variable is of type Person, even though it used the var keyword.
Anonymous types are created using new { Name = ... }. In this case it's a new, anonymous class. The only thing you can assign it to is a variable defined using var (or object) since there is no existing name to use.
For example:
var person = new { Name = "bob" };
In this case, person is an anonymous type defined at run time.
Generally, as @Chalkey says, if you want to pass the result back to another method, use a named type, not an anonymous one.
If you are forced to use an anonymous type, you'll have to pass it back as an object of type Object, then use reflection to get at it's properties.
Jon Skeet wrote a blog on how to do this, which is quite rightly titled Horribly Grotty Hack. Just as the title suggests, you really shouldn't be looking for ways to return an anonymous type. Instead, you should be creating a type that can be returned as this is the correct way to implement this feature.
Therefore, I recommend you create a concrete definition of the type to be returned and then populate that in your query for it to be returned.
It kind of depends on how the calling code is going to use the data.
If you are doing simple data binding, are really don't care about the type (i.e. you don't have to explicitly access properties in your C# code), you can pass the results back as an IEnumberable.
In most databinding cases you are calling properties by name, via magic strings, anyway, so the exact type doesn't matter anyway.
Otherwise, you need to convert the anonymous type to a named type.
If you have to pass around results in a large app you can use Dictionary. Yes you have some overhead when casting but at least you are reducing you throw away objects.
