可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I want to compute inventory costs using average value, and I'm somewhat stuck here...
Consider a simple transaction table tr: (ids are autoincrement, negative volume indicates a sell transaction)
order_id | volume | price | type
1 | 1000 | 100 | B
2 | -500 | 110 | S
3 | 1500 | 80 | B
4 | -100 | 150 | S
5 | -600 | 110 | S
6 | 700 | 105 | B
Now I want to know the total volume and total costs after each transaction. The difficulty is getting the sells right. Sells are always valued at the average cost at this point (ie the sell price is actually not relevant here), so the transaction order does matter here.
Optimally, the result would look like this:
order_id | volume | price | total_vol | total_costs | unit_costs
1 | 1000 | 100 | 1000 | 100000 | 100
2 | -500 | 110 | 500 | 50000 | 100
3 | 1500 | 80 | 2000 | 170000 | 85
4 | -100 | 150 | 1900 | 161500 | 85
5 | -600 | 110 | 1300 | 110500 | 85
6 | 700 | 105 | 2000 | 184000 | 92
Now, total_vol is easy with a sum(volume) over (...), total costs on the other hand. I've played around with window functions, but unless I'm missing something totally obvious (or very clever), I don't think it can be done with window functions alone...
Any help would be appreciated. :)
UPDATE:
This is the code I finally used, a combination of both answers (the data model is a bit more complex than my simplified example above, but you get the idea):
select ser_num
, tr_id
, tr_date
, action_typ
, volume
, price
, total_vol
, trunc(total_costs,0) total_costs
, trunc(unit_costs,4) unit_costs
from itt
model
partition by (ser_num)
dimension by (row_number() over (partition by ser_num order by tr_date, tr_id) rn)
measures (tr_id, tr_date, volume, price, action_typ, 0 total_vol, 0 total_costs, 0 unit_costs)
rules automatic order
( total_vol[ANY] order by rn
= nvl(total_vol[cv()-1],0) +
decode(action_typ[cv()], 'Buy', 1, 'Sell', -1) * volume[cv()]
, total_costs[ANY] order by rn
= case action_typ[cv()]
when 'Buy' then volume[cv()] * price[cv()] + nvl(total_costs[cv()-1],0)
when 'Sell' then total_vol[cv()] * nvl(unit_costs[cv()-1],price[cv()])
end
, unit_costs[ANY] order by rn
= decode(total_vol[cv()], 0, unit_costs[cv()-1],
total_costs[cv()] / total_vol[cv()])
)
order by ser_num, tr_date, tr_id
Some observations:
- When using partitions and references to the previous cell (
cv()-1), the dimension has to be partitioned in the same way as the whole model clause (this is also why using iteration_number can be tricky)
- No iteration is needed here as long as you specify the correct execution order on the rules (
order by rnAutomatic order does this automatically)
Automatic order is probably not necessary here, but it cant hurt.
回答1:
You can use the MODEL clause to do this recursive calculation
Create sample table and insert data
create table costs (order_id int, volume int, price numeric(16,4), type char(1));
insert into costs (order_id, volume, price) values (1,1000,100);
insert into costs (order_id, volume, price) values (2,-500,110);
insert into costs (order_id, volume, price) values (3,1500,80);
insert into costs (order_id, volume, price) values (4,-100,150);
insert into costs (order_id, volume, price) values (5,-600,110);
insert into costs (order_id, volume, price) values (6,700,105);
The query (EDITED changing rules iterate(1000) to rules automatic order implements the MODEL clause as it is intended to function, i.e. top to bottom sequentially. It also took the query from 0.44s to 0.01s!)
select order_id, volume, price, total_vol, total_costs, unit_costs
from (select order_id, volume, price,
volume total_vol,
0.0 total_costs,
0.0 unit_costs,
row_number() over (order by order_id) rn
from costs order by order_id)
model
dimension by (order_id)
measures (volume, price, total_vol, total_costs, unit_costs)
rules automatic order -- iterate(1000)
( total_vol[any] = volume[cv()] + nvl(total_vol[cv()-1],0.0),
total_costs[any] =
case SIGN(volume[cv()])
when -1 then total_vol[cv()] * nvl(unit_costs[cv()-1],0.0)
else volume[cv()] * price[cv()] + nvl(total_costs[cv()-1],0.0)
end,
unit_costs[any] = total_costs[cv()] / total_vol[cv()]
)
order by order_id
Output
ORDER_ID VOLUME PRICE TOTAL_VOL TOTAL_COSTS UNIT_COSTS
1 1000 100 1000 100000 100
2 -500 110 500 50000 100
3 1500 80 2000 170000 85
4 -100 150 1900 161500 85
5 -600 110 1300 110500 85
6 700 105 2000 184000 92
This site has a good tutorial on the MODEL clause
- http://www.sqlsnippets.com/en/topic-11663.html
The EXCEL sheet for the data above would look like this, with the formula extended downwards
A B C D E F
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1| order_id volume price total_vol total_costs unit_costs
2| 0 0 0
3| 1 1000 100 =C4+E3 =IF(C4<0,G3*E4,F3+C4*D4) =F4/E4
4| 2 -500 110 =C5+E4 =IF(C5<0,G4*E5,F4+C5*D5) =F5/E5
5| 3 1500 80 =C6+E5 =IF(C6<0,G5*E6,F5+C6*D6) =F6/E6
6| 4 -100 150 =C7+E6 =IF(C7<0,G6*E7,F6+C7*D7) =F7/E7
7| 5 -600 110 =C8+E7 =IF(C8<0,G7*E8,F7+C8*D8) =F8/E8
8| 6 700 105 =C9+E8 =IF(C9<0,G8*E9,F8+C9*D9) =F9/E9
回答2:
There is a problem with Richard's model clause query. It is doing 1000 iterations without an UNTIL clause. After four iterations the end result is achieved already. The next 996 iterations consume CPU power, but do nothing.
Here you can see that the query is done processing after 4 iterations with the current data set:
SQL> select order_id
2 , volume
3 , price
4 , total_vol
5 , total_costs
6 , unit_costs
7 from ( select order_id
8 , volume
9 , price
10 , volume total_vol
11 , 0.0 total_costs
12 , 0.0 unit_costs
13 , row_number() over (order by order_id) rn
14 from costs
15 order by order_id
16 )
17 model
18 dimension by (order_id)
19 measures (volume, price, total_vol, total_costs, unit_costs)
20 rules iterate (4)
21 ( total_vol[any] = volume[cv()] + nvl(total_vol[cv()-1],0.0)
22 , total_costs[any]
23 = case SIGN(volume[cv()])
24 when -1 then total_vol[cv()] * nvl(unit_costs[cv()-1],0.0)
25 else volume[cv()] * price[cv()] + nvl(total_costs[cv()-1],0.0)
26 end
27 , unit_costs[any] = total_costs[cv()] / total_vol[cv()]
28 )
29 order by order_id
30 /
ORDER_ID VOLUME PRICE TOTAL_VOL TOTAL_COSTS UNIT_COSTS
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
1 1000 100 1000 100000 100
2 -500 110 500 50000 100
3 1500 80 2000 170000 85
4 -100 150 1900 161500 85
5 -600 110 1300 110500 85
6 700 105 2000 184000 92
6 rows selected.
It needs 4 iterations and not 6, because automatic order is used, and each iteration tries to adjust all 6 rows.
You are far more performant if you use just as many iterations as there are rows and each iteration adjusts just one row. You can also skip the subquery and then the final query becomes:
SQL> select order_id
2 , volume
3 , price
4 , total_vol
5 , total_costs
6 , unit_costs
7 from costs
8 model
9 dimension by (row_number() over (order by order_id) rn)
10 measures (order_id, volume, price, type, 0 total_vol, 0 total_costs, 0 unit_costs)
11 rules iterate (1000) until (order_id[iteration_number+2] is null)
12 ( total_vol[iteration_number+1]
13 = nvl(total_vol[iteration_number],0) + volume[iteration_number+1]
14 , total_costs[iteration_number+1]
15 = case type[iteration_number+1]
16 when 'B' then volume[iteration_number+1] * price[iteration_number+1] + nvl(total_costs[iteration_number],0)
17 when 'S' then total_vol[iteration_number+1] * nvl(unit_costs[iteration_number],0)
18 end
19 , unit_costs[iteration_number+1]
20 = total_costs[iteration_number+1] / total_vol[iteration_number+1]
21 )
22 order by order_id
23 /
ORDER_ID VOLUME PRICE TOTAL_VOL TOTAL_COSTS UNIT_COSTS
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
1 1000 100 1000 100000 100
2 -500 110 500 50000 100
3 1500 80 2000 170000 85
4 -100 150 1900 161500 85
5 -600 110 1300 110500 85
6 700 105 2000 184000 92
6 rows selected.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Rob.
EDIT
Some proof to backup my claim:
SQL> create procedure p1 (p_number_of_iterations in number)
2 is
3 begin
4 for x in 1 .. p_number_of_iterations
5 loop
6 for r in
7 ( select order_id
8 , volume
9 , price
10 , total_vol
11 , total_costs
12 , unit_costs
13 from ( select order_id
14 , volume
15 , price
16 , volume total_vol
17 , 0.0 total_costs
18 , 0.0 unit_costs
19 , row_number() over (order by order_id) rn
20 from costs
21 order by order_id
22 )
23 model
24 dimension by (order_id)
25 measures (volume, price, total_vol, total_costs, unit_costs)
26 rules iterate (4)
27 ( total_vol[any] = volume[cv()] + nvl(total_vol[cv()-1],0.0)
28 , total_costs[any]
29 = case SIGN(volume[cv()])
30 when -1 then total_vol[cv()] * nvl(unit_costs[cv()-1],0.0)
31 else volume[cv()] * price[cv()] + nvl(total_costs[cv()-1],0.0)
32 end
33 , unit_costs[any] = total_costs[cv()] / total_vol[cv()]
34 )
35 order by order_id
36 )
37 loop
38 null;
39 end loop;
40 end loop;
41 end p1;
42 /
Procedure created.
SQL> create procedure p2 (p_number_of_iterations in number)
2 is
3 begin
4 for x in 1 .. p_number_of_iterations
5 loop
6 for r in
7 ( select order_id
8 , volume
9 , price
10 , total_vol
11 , total_costs
12 , unit_costs
13 from costs
14 model
15 dimension by (row_number() over (order by order_id) rn)
16 measures (order_id, volume, price, type, 0 total_vol, 0 total_costs, 0 unit_costs)
17 rules iterate (1000) until (order_id[iteration_number+2] is null)
18 ( total_vol[iteration_number+1]
19 = nvl(total_vol[iteration_number],0) + volume[iteration_number+1]
20 , total_costs[iteration_number+1]
21 = case type[iteration_number+1]
22 when 'B' then volume[iteration_number+1] * price[iteration_number+1] + nvl(total_costs[iteration_number],0)
23 when 'S' then total_vol[iteration_number+1] * nvl(unit_costs[iteration_number],0)
24 end
25 , unit_costs[iteration_number+1]
26 = total_costs[iteration_number+1] / total_vol[iteration_number+1]
27 )
28 order by order_id
29 )
30 loop
31 null;
32 end loop;
33 end loop;
34 end p2;
35 /
Procedure created.
SQL> set timing on
SQL> exec p1(1000)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:01.32
SQL> exec p2(1000)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.45
SQL> exec p1(1000)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:01.28
SQL> exec p2(1000)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.43
{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://img.manongdao.com/sparkler-677774__340.jpg', '推荐 狗以群分 的文章《Inventory Average Cost Calculation in SQL》','https://www.manongdao.com/article-162086.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}