我已经看到了另一个类似的线程，但我没能解决我的问题给定答案。
说明我的目标：
我有4个纺纱厂，每个人都有自己通过一个适配器分配给它的字符串的ArrayList的。 所有这些阵列都包含在开始时相同的值。
我想删除从所有其他纺纱选定的值（例如，在spinner1“项目”）（得自spinner2，3删除“项目”和4）当选择它。
问题：
当我选择来自不同纺纱第一两次或三次的项目（ 再现问题所需的选择的数目而变化 ）的onItemSelected（）方法被调用多次（召唤的数目大于实际-user的数目大 - 选择制造）。
题：
如何防止调用onItemSelected(); 在不必要的时间。 我想它，只有当实际用户进行选择在纺纱厂之一被调用，只调用一次时确实会发生。
如果您想尝试帮助我，你需要更多的代码/设备本身问题的图像，请说出来。
这里是我的整个onItemSelected（）方法：
@Override
public void onItemSelected(AdapterView<?> parent, View view, int position, long id) {
if (inCorrection == false)
{
s1 = spinner1.getSelectedItemPosition();
s2 = spinner2.getSelectedItemPosition();
s3 = spinner3.getSelectedItemPosition();
s4 = spinner4.getSelectedItemPosition();
testcount++;
switch(parent.getId())
{
case R.id.v1_q1_s1:
if((position != AdapterView.INVALID_POSITION) && (spinner1.getSelectedItem().toString() != "Default---"))
{
findLists(myList2, myList3, myList4, spinner1.getSelectedItem().toString());
if(returnChecks(0) != "Default---")
{
myList2.add(returnChecks(0));
myList3.add(returnChecks(0));
myList4.add(returnChecks(0));
}
addChecks(0, (spinner1.getSelectedItem().toString()));
}
else
{
if(position != AdapterView.INVALID_POSITION)
{
myList2.add(returnChecks(0));
myList3.add(returnChecks(0));
myList4.add(returnChecks(0));
addChecks(0, (spinner1.getSelectedItem().toString()));
}
}
adapter1.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter2.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter3.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter4.notifyDataSetChanged();
Toast.makeText(Vprasalnik1.this, myList1.toString()+"\n"+myList2.toString()+"\n"+myList3.toString()+"\n"+myList4.toString()+"\n"+checks.toString(), Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
break;
case R.id.v1_q1_s2:
if((position != AdapterView.INVALID_POSITION) && (spinner2.getSelectedItem().toString() != "Default---"))
{
findLists(myList1, myList3, myList4, spinner2.getSelectedItem().toString());
if(returnChecks(1) != "Default---")
{
myList1.add(returnChecks(1));
myList3.add(returnChecks(1));
myList4.add(returnChecks(1));
}
addChecks(1, (spinner2.getSelectedItem().toString()));
}
else
{
if(position != AdapterView.INVALID_POSITION)
{
myList1.add(returnChecks(1));
myList3.add(returnChecks(1));
myList4.add(returnChecks(1));
addChecks(1, (spinner2.getSelectedItem().toString()));
}
}
adapter1.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter2.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter3.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter4.notifyDataSetChanged();
Toast.makeText(Vprasalnik1.this, myList1.toString()+"\n"+myList2.toString()+"\n"+myList3.toString()+"\n"+myList4.toString()+"\n"+checks.toString(), Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
break;
case R.id.v1_q1_s3:
if((position != AdapterView.INVALID_POSITION) && (spinner3.getSelectedItem().toString() != "Default---"))
{
findLists(myList2, myList1, myList4, spinner3.getSelectedItem().toString());
if(returnChecks(2) != "Default---")
{
myList2.add(returnChecks(2));
myList1.add(returnChecks(2));
myList4.add(returnChecks(2));
Toast.makeText(Vprasalnik1.this, "before: "+returnChecks(2), Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
}
addChecks(2, (spinner3.getSelectedItem().toString()));
Toast.makeText(Vprasalnik1.this, "after: "+returnChecks(2), Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
}
else
{
if(position != AdapterView.INVALID_POSITION)
{
myList2.add(returnChecks(2));
myList1.add(returnChecks(2));
myList4.add(returnChecks(2));
addChecks(2, (spinner3.getSelectedItem().toString()));
}
}
adapter1.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter2.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter3.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter4.notifyDataSetChanged();
Toast.makeText(Vprasalnik1.this, myList1.toString()+"\n"+myList2.toString()+"\n"+myList3.toString()+"\n"+myList4.toString()+"\n"+checks.toString(), Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
break;
case R.id.v1_q1_s4:
if((position != AdapterView.INVALID_POSITION) && (spinner4.getSelectedItem().toString() != "Default---"))
{
findLists(myList2, myList3, myList1, spinner4.getSelectedItem().toString());
if(returnChecks(3) != "Default---")
{
myList2.add(returnChecks(3));
myList3.add(returnChecks(3));
myList1.add(returnChecks(3));
}
addChecks(3, (spinner4.getSelectedItem().toString()));
}
else
{
if(position != AdapterView.INVALID_POSITION)
{
myList2.add(returnChecks(3));
myList3.add(returnChecks(3));
myList1.add(returnChecks(3));
addChecks(3, (spinner4.getSelectedItem().toString()));
}
}
adapter1.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter2.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter3.notifyDataSetChanged();
adapter4.notifyDataSetChanged();
Toast.makeText(Vprasalnik1.this, myList1.toString()+"\n"+myList2.toString()+"\n"+myList3.toString()+"\n"+myList4.toString()+"\n"+checks.toString(), Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
break;
}
correctSelection();
}
}
在上面的代码中的端部有一个我打电话命名函数correctSelection(); ，纠正所有纺纱厂的选择，因为它不能正常工作，否则 - 它看起来像这样：
void correctSelection()
{
inCorrection = true;
spinner1.setSelection(myList1.lastIndexOf(returnChecks(0)));
spinner2.setSelection(myList2.lastIndexOf(returnChecks(1)));
spinner3.setSelection(myList3.lastIndexOf(returnChecks(2)));
spinner4.setSelection(myList4.lastIndexOf(returnChecks(3)));
inCorrection = false;
}
/*it sets the position of all spinners to the last "saved"
(current) item selected, so it corrects the possible index offset that occurs otherwise
(returnChecks(); returns the last item selected from an array in a string format)
PS: To avoid the calling of onItemSelected() in case of programmatically setting the selection
of spinners, I've input a boolean flag (variable "inCorrection"), which is set to false before the
selections are made by "the application" and then set back to false when the code gets run.
*/
