Working on some matrix algebra here. Sometimes I need to invert a matrix that may be singular or ill-conditioned. I understand it is pythonic to simply do this:
try:
i = linalg.inv(x)
except LinAlgErr as err:
#handle it
but am not sure how efficient that is. Wouldn't this be better?
if linalg.cond(x) < 1/sys.float_info.epsilon:
i = linalg.inv(x)
else:
#handle it
Does numpy.linalg simply perform up front the test I proscribed?
Your first solution catches the case where your matrix is so singular that numpy cannot cope at all - potentially quite an extreme case. Your second solution is better, because it catches the case where numpy gives an answer, but that answer is potentially corrupted by rounding error - this seems much more sensible.
If you are trying to invert ill-conditioned matrices, then you should consider using singular value decomposition. If used carefully, it can give you a sensible answer where other routines fail.
If you don't want SVD, then see also my comment about using lu_factor instead of inv.
So based on the inputs here, I'm marking my original code block with the explicit test as the solution:
if linalg.cond(x) < 1/sys.float_info.epsilon:
i = linalg.inv(x)
else:
#handle it
Surprisingly, the numpy.linalg.inv function doesn't perform this test. I checked the code and found it goes through all it's machinations, then just calls the lapack routine - seems quite inefficient. Also, I would 2nd a point made by DaveP: that the inverse of a matrix should not be computed unless it's explicitly needed.
You should compute the condition number of the matrix to see if it is invertible.
import numpy.linalg
if numpy.isfinite(numpy.linalg.cond(A)):
B = numpy.linalg.inv(A)
else:
# handle it
Why not just check if the determinant is nonzero?
det = numpy.linalg.det(A)
if det != 0:
#proceed