If so how? In my last question I asked why this snippet is crashing:
@JSExport("Test") object TestScalaJs {
@JSExport def callMe[A: ClassTag](f: js.Function1[Int, A]): Array[A] = Array(f(4))
}
on:
var res = Test().callMe(function(x) {return x + 'x';});
console.log('TestScalaJs:', res.join(', '));
with:
$c_jl_Throwable.fillInStackTrace__jl_Throwable @ VM153:4161
$c_sjsr_UndefinedBehaviorError.fillInStackTrace__jl_Throwable @ VM153:9241
$c_jl_Throwable.init___T__jl_Throwable @ VM153:4177
$c_sjsr_UndefinedBehaviorError.init___T__jl_Throwable @ VM153:9248
$c_sjsr_UndefinedBehaviorError.init___jl_Throwable @ VM153:9244
$throwClassCastException @ VM153:196
$as_s_reflect_ClassTag @ VM153:7824
$c_LTestScalaJs$.callMe @ VM153:2061
(anonymous function) @ VM155:2
$s_Lscalatags_jsdom_Frag$class__applyTo__Lscalatags_jsdom_Frag__Lorg_scalajs_dom_raw_Element__V @ VM153:1108
$c_Lscalatags_JsDom$TypedTag.applyTo__O__V @ VM153:9981
$c_Lfiddle_Fiddle$.println__sc_Seq__V @ VM153:2113
$c_LScalaFiddle$.init___ @ VM153:2021
$m_LScalaFiddle$ @ VM153:2034
(anonymous function) @ VM154:1
(anonymous function) @ VM77 resultframe?theme=light:32
And the response was that it is because I am missing implicit argument for callMe
. I didn't think of that before because, well, Scala is providing it auto-magically, so this just worked on a first try:
object TestVanilla {
def callMe[A: ClassTag](f: Int => A): Array[A] = Array(f(4))
}
val res = TestVanilla.callMe(_ + "x");
println(res.mkString(", "));
The question is:
How one is supposed to be writing type-safe (at least in a compilation time, no need for dynamic checking) libraries using ordinary features of Scala like integers, arrays, functions, generics and ClassTag
s in ScalaJS which can be then easily* used from JavaScript? I really hope it is possible.
*: I mean like no arcane requirements such as manual construction of ClassTag
s from JavaScript.