I have written the following earth-shattering application:
class SomeA { }; class SomeB { }; class SomeC { };
template <typename A, typename B, typename... Cs>
class Foo {
public:
template <typename U> static void bar();
};
template <typename U>
void Foo<SomeA, SomeB, SomeC>::bar() { };
int main() { return 0; }
When I compile this (gcc 4.9.3 with -std=c++11
), I get the following error:
a.cpp:10:36: error: ambiguating new declaration of ‘static void Foo<SomeA, SomeB, SomeC>::bar()’
void Foo<SomeA, SomeB, SomeC>::bar() { };
^
a.cpp:6:36: note: old declaration ‘static void Foo<A, B, Cs>::bar() [with U = U; A = SomeA; B = SomeB; Cs = {SomeC}]’
template <typename U> static void bar();
^
Why is this an "ambiguating declaration", and how else can I implement bar for all U
s but for a specific instantiation of Foo
?
With clang 3.6.2, I get the error:
a.cpp:9:1: error: template parameter list matching the non-templated nested type 'Foo<SomeA, SomeB, SomeC>' should be empty ('template<>')
template <typename U>
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't really get this either. How am I supposed to template over U if clang wants an empty parameter list?