I have a large sparse matrix A
, and I would like to create a sparse matrix of the 3X3 block diagonals of A. How would I do this? keep in mind that A
is very large and sparse, so any methods that use iteration will be slow, and any methods that use some methods that creates full (as opposed to sparse) matrices will take up too much memory.
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
回答1:
If I understand correctly, here is some code (see the portions between the %%%%%%%%%%%
lines. Below are timing results, which seem reasonable to me, despite the for
loop. The only trick is the use of the spalloc function, which you may have to tune for your application.
for N= [(3:3:12) (15:600:9000)]
bigsparse = sprand(N,N,0.1);
tic;
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
origSize = size(bigsparse);
diagSize = 3;
numDiags = size(bigsparse,1)/diagSize;
assert(numDiags == floor(numDiags))
bigsparse_diagonals = spalloc(origSize(1), origSize(2), ceil(prod(origSize)*0.1));
for ix=(1:numDiags)-1
ixsCurrent = ix*diagSize+[1:diagSize];
bigsparse_diagonals(ixsCurrent,ixsCurrent) = ...
bigsparse(ixsCurrent,ixsCurrent);
end
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
fprintf(1,'%5d size --> %6.5f seconds \n', N, toc)
end
Timing results (note, it actually takes a lot longer to generate the random test matrix than to do the reformatting):
3 size --> 0.00135 seconds 6 size --> 0.00014 seconds 9 size --> 0.00013 seconds 12 size --> 0.00014 seconds 15 size --> 0.00015 seconds 615 size --> 0.00392 seconds 1215 size --> 0.00874 seconds 1815 size --> 0.01537 seconds 2415 size --> 0.02570 seconds 3015 size --> 0.03595 seconds 3615 size --> 0.05007 seconds 4215 size --> 0.06420 seconds 4815 size --> 0.08690 seconds 5415 size --> 0.10077 seconds 6015 size --> 0.13322 seconds 6615 size --> 0.14923 seconds 7215 size --> 0.17562 seconds 7815 size --> 0.37371 seconds 8415 size --> 0.23060 seconds