可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
Is it possible to add a documentation string to a namedtuple in an easy manner?
I tried
from collections import namedtuple
Point = namedtuple("Point", ["x", "y"])
"""
A point in 2D space
"""
# Yet another test
"""
A(nother) point in 2D space
"""
Point2 = namedtuple("Point2", ["x", "y"])
print Point.__doc__ # -> "Point(x, y)"
print Point2.__doc__ # -> "Point2(x, y)"
but that doesn't cut it. Is it possible to do in some other way?
回答1:
You can achieve this by creating a simple, empty wrapper class around the returned value from namedtuple
. Contents of a file I created (nt.py
):
from collections import namedtuple
Point_ = namedtuple("Point", ["x", "y"])
class Point(Point_):
""" A point in 2d space """
pass
Then in the Python REPL:
>>> print nt.Point.__doc__
A point in 2d space
Or you could do:
>>> help(nt.Point) # which outputs...
Help on class Point in module nt:
class Point(Point)
| A point in 2d space
|
| Method resolution order:
| Point
| Point
| __builtin__.tuple
| __builtin__.object
...
If you don't like doing that by hand every time, it's trivial to write a sort-of factory function to do this:
def NamedTupleWithDocstring(docstring, *ntargs):
nt = namedtuple(*ntargs)
class NT(nt):
__doc__ = docstring
return NT
Point3D = NamedTupleWithDocstring("A point in 3d space", "Point3d", ["x", "y", "z"])
p3 = Point3D(1,2,3)
print p3.__doc__
which outputs:
A point in 3d space
回答2:
Came across this old question via Google while wondering the same thing.
Just wanted to point out that you can tidy it up even more by calling namedtuple() right from the class declaration:
from collections import namedtuple
class Point(namedtuple('Point', 'x y')):
"""Here is the docstring."""
回答3:
In Python 3, no wrapper is needed, as the __doc__
attributes of types is writable.
from collections import namedtuple
Point = namedtuple('Point', 'x y')
Point.__doc__ = '''\
A 2-dimensional coordinate
x - the abscissa
y - the ordinate'''
This closely corresponds to a standard class definition, where the docstring follows the header.
class Point():
'''A 2-dimensional coordinate
x - the abscissa
y - the ordinate'''
<class code>
This does not work in Python 2.
AttributeError: attribute '__doc__' of 'type' objects is not writable
.
回答4:
Is it possible to add a documentation string to a namedtuple in an easy manner?
Python 3
In Python 3, you can easily alter the doc on your namedtuple:
NT = collections.namedtuple('NT', 'foo bar')
NT.__doc__ = """:param str foo: foo name
:param list bar: List of bars to bar"""
Which allows us to view the intent for them when we call help on them:
Help on class NT in module __main__:
class NT(builtins.tuple)
| :param str foo: foo name
| :param list bar: List of bars to bar
...
This is really straightforward compared to the difficulties we have accomplishing the same thing in Python 2.
Python 2
In Python 2, you'll need to
- subclass the namedtuple, and
- declare
__slots__ == ()
Declaring __slots__
is an important part that the other answers here miss .
If you don't declare __slots__
- you could add mutable ad-hoc attributes to the instances, introducing bugs.
class Foo(namedtuple('Foo', 'bar')):
"""no __slots__ = ()!!!"""
And now:
>>> f = Foo('bar')
>>> f.bar
'bar'
>>> f.baz = 'what?'
>>> f.__dict__
{'baz': 'what?'}
Each instance will create a separate __dict__
when __dict__
is accessed (the lack of __slots__
won't otherwise impede the functionality, but the lightweightness of the tuple, immutability, and declared attributes are all important features of namedtuples).
You'll also want a __repr__
, if you want what is echoed on the command line to give you an equivalent object:
NTBase = collections.namedtuple('NTBase', 'foo bar')
class NT(NTBase):
"""
Individual foo bar, a namedtuple
:param str foo: foo name
:param list bar: List of bars to bar
"""
__slots__ = ()
a __repr__
like this is needed if you create the base namedtuple with a different name (like we did above with the name string argument, 'NTBase'
):
def __repr__(self):
return 'NT(foo={0}, bar={1})'.format(
repr(self.foo), repr(self.bar))
To test the repr, instantiate, then test for equality of a pass to eval(repr(instance))
nt = NT('foo', 'bar')
assert eval(repr(nt)) == nt
Example from the documentation
The docs also give such an example, regarding __slots__
- I'm adding my own docstring to it:
class Point(namedtuple('Point', 'x y')):
"""Docstring added here, not in original"""
__slots__ = ()
@property
def hypot(self):
return (self.x ** 2 + self.y ** 2) ** 0.5
def __str__(self):
return 'Point: x=%6.3f y=%6.3f hypot=%6.3f' % (self.x, self.y, self.hypot)
...
The subclass shown above sets __slots__
to an empty tuple. This helps
keep memory requirements low by preventing the creation of instance
dictionaries.
This demonstrates in-place usage (like another answer here suggests), but note that the in-place usage may become confusing when you look at the method resolution order, if you're debugging, which is why I originally suggested using Base
as a suffix for the base namedtuple:
>>> Point.mro()
[<class '__main__.Point'>, <class '__main__.Point'>, <type 'tuple'>, <type 'object'>]
# ^^^^^---------------------^^^^^-- same names!
To prevent creation of a __dict__
when subclassing from a class that uses it, you must also declare it in the subclass. See also this answer for more caveats on using __slots__
.
回答5:
Since Python 3.5, docstrings for namedtuple
objects can be updated.
From the whatsnew:
Point = namedtuple('Point', ['x', 'y'])
Point.__doc__ += ': Cartesian coodinate'
Point.x.__doc__ = 'abscissa'
Point.y.__doc__ = 'ordinate'
回答6:
No need to use a wrapper class as suggested by the accepted answer. Simply literally add a docstring:
from collections import namedtuple
Point = namedtuple("Point", ["x", "y"])
Point.__doc__="A point in 2D space"
This results in: (example using ipython3
):
In [1]: Point?
Type: type
String Form:<class '__main__.Point'>
Docstring: A point in 2D space
In [2]:
Voilà!
回答7:
In Python 3.6+ you can use:
class Point(NamedTuple):
"""
A point in 2D space
"""
x: float
y: float
回答8:
You could concoct your own version of the namedtuple factory function by Raymond Hettinger and add an optional docstring
argument. However it would be easier -- and arguably better -- to just define your own factory function using the same basic technique as in the recipe. Either way, you'll end up with something reusable.
from collections import namedtuple
def my_namedtuple(typename, field_names, verbose=False,
rename=False, docstring=''):
'''Returns a new subclass of namedtuple with the supplied
docstring appended to the default one.
>>> Point = my_namedtuple('Point', 'x, y', docstring='A point in 2D space')
>>> print Point.__doc__
Point(x, y): A point in 2D space
'''
# create a base class and concatenate its docstring and the one passed
_base = namedtuple(typename, field_names, verbose, rename)
_docstring = ''.join([_base.__doc__, ': ', docstring])
# fill in template to create a no-op subclass with the combined docstring
template = '''class subclass(_base):
%(_docstring)r
pass\n''' % locals()
# execute code string in a temporary namespace
namespace = dict(_base=_base, _docstring=_docstring)
try:
exec template in namespace
except SyntaxError, e:
raise SyntaxError(e.message + ':\n' + template)
return namespace['subclass'] # subclass object created
回答9:
I created this function to quickly create a named tuple and document the tuple along with each of its parameters:
from collections import namedtuple
def named_tuple(name, description='', **kwargs):
"""
A named tuple with docstring documentation of each of its parameters
:param str name: The named tuple's name
:param str description: The named tuple's description
:param kwargs: This named tuple's parameters' data with two different ways to describe said parameters. Format:
<pre>{
str: ( # The parameter's name
str, # The parameter's type
str # The parameter's description
),
str: str, # The parameter's name: the parameter's description
... # Any other parameters
}</pre>
:return: collections.namedtuple
"""
parameter_names = list(kwargs.keys())
result = namedtuple(name, ' '.join(parameter_names))
# If there are any parameters provided (such that this is not an empty named tuple)
if len(parameter_names):
# Add line spacing before describing this named tuple's parameters
if description is not '':
description += "\n"
# Go through each parameter provided and add it to the named tuple's docstring description
for parameter_name in parameter_names:
parameter_data = kwargs[parameter_name]
# Determine whether parameter type is included along with the description or
# if only a description was provided
parameter_type = ''
if isinstance(parameter_data, str):
parameter_description = parameter_data
else:
parameter_type, parameter_description = parameter_data
description += "\n:param {type}{name}: {description}".format(
type=parameter_type + ' ' if parameter_type else '',
name=parameter_name,
description=parameter_description
)
# Change the docstring specific to this parameter
getattr(result, parameter_name).__doc__ = parameter_description
# Set the docstring description for the resulting named tuple
result.__doc__ = description
return result
You can then create a new named tuple:
MyTuple = named_tuple(
"MyTuple",
"My named tuple for x,y coordinates",
x="The x value",
y="The y value"
)
Then instantiate the described named tuple with your own data, ie.
t = MyTuple(4, 8)
print(t) # prints: MyTuple(x=4, y=8)
When executing help(MyTuple)
via the python3 command line the following is shown:
Help on class MyTuple:
class MyTuple(builtins.tuple)
| MyTuple(x, y)
|
| My named tuple for x,y coordinates
|
| :param x: The x value
| :param y: The y value
|
| Method resolution order:
| MyTuple
| builtins.tuple
| builtins.object
|
| Methods defined here:
|
| __getnewargs__(self)
| Return self as a plain tuple. Used by copy and pickle.
|
| __repr__(self)
| Return a nicely formatted representation string
|
| _asdict(self)
| Return a new OrderedDict which maps field names to their values.
|
| _replace(_self, **kwds)
| Return a new MyTuple object replacing specified fields with new values
|
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Class methods defined here:
|
| _make(iterable) from builtins.type
| Make a new MyTuple object from a sequence or iterable
|
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Static methods defined here:
|
| __new__(_cls, x, y)
| Create new instance of MyTuple(x, y)
|
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Data descriptors defined here:
|
| x
| The x value
|
| y
| The y value
|
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Data and other attributes defined here:
|
| _fields = ('x', 'y')
|
| _fields_defaults = {}
|
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Methods inherited from builtins.tuple:
|
| __add__(self, value, /)
| Return self+value.
|
| __contains__(self, key, /)
| Return key in self.
|
| __eq__(self, value, /)
| Return self==value.
|
| __ge__(self, value, /)
| Return self>=value.
|
| __getattribute__(self, name, /)
| Return getattr(self, name).
|
| __getitem__(self, key, /)
| Return self[key].
|
| __gt__(self, value, /)
| Return self>value.
|
| __hash__(self, /)
| Return hash(self).
|
| __iter__(self, /)
| Implement iter(self).
|
| __le__(self, value, /)
| Return self<=value.
|
| __len__(self, /)
| Return len(self).
|
| __lt__(self, value, /)
| Return self<value.
|
| __mul__(self, value, /)
| Return self*value.
|
| __ne__(self, value, /)
| Return self!=value.
|
| __rmul__(self, value, /)
| Return value*self.
|
| count(self, value, /)
| Return number of occurrences of value.
|
| index(self, value, start=0, stop=9223372036854775807, /)
| Return first index of value.
|
| Raises ValueError if the value is not present.
Alternatively, you can also specify the parameter's type via:
MyTuple = named_tuple(
"MyTuple",
"My named tuple for x,y coordinates",
x=("int", "The x value"),
y=("int", "The y value")
)
回答10:
No, you can only add doc strings to modules, classes and function (including methods)