How expensive is it to compute the eigenvalues of

问题:

How expensive is it to compute the eigenvalues of a matrix?

What is the complexity of the best algorithms?

How long might it take in practice if I have a 1000 x 1000 matrix? I assume it helps if the matrix is sparse?

Are there any cases where the eigenvalue computation would not terminate?

In R, I can compute the eigenvalues as in the following toy example:

m<-matrix( c(13,2, 5,4), ncol=2, nrow=2 )
eigen(m, only.values=1)
$values
[1] 14  3

Does anyone know what algorithm it uses?

Are there any other (open-source) packages that compute the eigenvalue?

回答1:

Most of the algorithms for eigen value computations scale to big-Oh(n^3), where n is the row/col dimension of the (symmetric and square) matrix.

For knowing the time complexity of the best algorithm till date you would have to refer to the latest research papers in Scientific Computing/Numerical Methods.

But even if you assume the worse case, you would still need at least 1000^3 operations for a 1000x1000 matrix.

R uses the LAPACK routine's (DSYEVR, DGEEV, ZHEEV and ZGEEV) implementation by default. However you could specify the EISPACK=TRUE as a parameter to use a EISPACK's RS, RG, CH and CG routines.

The most popular and good open source packages for eigenvalue computation are LAPACK and EISPACK.

回答2:

With big matrices you usually don't want all the eigenvalues. You just want the top few to do (say) a dimension reduction.

The canonical algorithm is the Arnoldi-Lanczos iterative algorithm implemented in ARPACK:

www.caam.rice.edu/software/ARPACK/

There is a matlab interface in eigs:

http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/index.html?/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/ref/eigs.html

eigs(A,k) and eigs(A,B,k) return the k largest magnitude eigenvalues.

And there is now an R interface as well:

http://igraph.sourceforge.net/doc-0.5/R/arpack.html

回答3:

I assume it helps if the matrix is sparse?

Yes, there are algorithms, that perform well on sparse matrices.

See for example: http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/

回答4:

How long might it take in practice if I have a 1000x1000 matrix?

MATLAB (based on LAPACK) computes on a dual-core 1.83 GHz machine all eigenvalues of a 1000x1000 random in roughly 5 seconds. When the matrix is symmetric, the computation can be done significantly faster and requires only about 1 second.

回答5:

I would take a look at Eigenvalue algorithms, which link to a number of different methods. They'll all have different characteristics, and hopefully one will be suitable for your purposes.

回答6:

Apache Mahout is an open-source framework built on map-reduce (i.e. it works for really really big matrices). Note that for a lot of matrix stuff the question isn't "whats the big-o runtime" but rather "how parallelizable is it?" Mahout says they use Lanczos, which can essentially be run in parallel on as many processors as you care to give it.

回答7:

It uses the QR algo. See Wilkinson, J. H. (1965) The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem. Clarendon Press, Oxford. It does not exploit sparsity.