可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I have a table of sensor data. Each row has a sensor id, a timestamp, and other fields. I want to select a single row with latest timestamp for each sensor, including some of the other fields.
I thought that the solution would be to group by sensor id and then order by max(timestamp) like so:
SELECT sensorID,timestamp,sensorField1,sensorField2
FROM sensorTable
GROUP BY sensorID
ORDER BY max(timestamp);
This gives me an error saying that "sensorField1 must appear in the group by clause or be used in an aggregate."
What is the correct way to approach this problem?
回答1:
For the sake of completeness, here's another possible solution:
SELECT sensorID,timestamp,sensorField1,sensorField2
FROM sensorTable s1
WHERE timestamp = (SELECT MAX(timestamp) FROM sensorTable s2 WHERE s1.sensorID = s2.sensorID)
GROUP BY sensorID;
Pretty self-explaining I think, but here's more info if you wish, as well as other examples. It's from the MySQL manual, but above query works with every RDBMS (implementing the sql'92 standard).
回答2:
This can de done in a relatively elegant way using SELECT DISTINCT
, as follows:
SELECT DISTINCT ON (sensorID)
sensorID, timestamp, sensorField1, sensorField2
FROM sensorTable
ORDER BY sensorID, timestamp DESC;
The above works for PostgreSQL (some more info here) but I think also other engines. In case it's not obvious, what this does is sort the table by sensor ID and timestamp (newest to oldest), and then returns the first row (i.e. latest timestamp) for each unique sensor ID.
In my use case I have ~10M readings from ~1K sensors, so trying to join the table with itself on a timestamp-based filter is very resource-intensive; the above takes a couple of seconds.
回答3:
You can join the table with itself (on sensor id), and add left.timestamp < right.timestamp
as join condition. Then you pick the rows, where right.id
is null
. Voila, you got the latest entry per sensor.
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!9/45147/37
SELECT L.* FROM sensorTable L
LEFT JOIN sensorTable R ON
L.sensorID = R.sensorID AND
L.timestamp < R.timestamp
WHERE isnull (R.sensorID)
But please note, that this will be very resource intensive if you have a little amount of ids and many values! So, I wouldn't recommend this for some sort of Measuring-Stuff, where each Sensor collects a value every minute. However in a Use-Case, where you need to track "Revisions" of something that changes just "sometimes", it's easy going.
回答4:
You can only select columns that are in the group or used in an aggregate function. You can use a join to get this working
select s1.*
from sensorTable s1
inner join
(
SELECT sensorID, max(timestamp) as mts
FROM sensorTable
GROUP BY sensorID
) s2 on s2.sensorID = s1.sensorID and s1.timestamp = s2.mts
回答5:
WITH SensorTimes As (
SELECT sensorID, MAX(timestamp) "LastReading"
FROM sensorTable
GROUP BY sensorID
)
SELECT s.sensorID,s.timestamp,s.sensorField1,s.sensorField2
FROM sensorTable s
INNER JOIN SensorTimes t on s.sensorID = t.sensorID and s.timestamp = t.LastReading
回答6:
I had mostly the same problem and ended up a a different solution that makes this type of problem trivial to query.
I have a table of sensor data (1 minute data from about 30 sensors)
SensorReadings->(timestamp,value,idSensor)
and I have a sensor table that has lots of mostly static stuff about the sensor but the relevant fields are these:
Sensors->(idSensor,Description,tvLastUpdate,tvLastValue,...)
The tvLastupdate and tvLastValue are set in a trigger on inserts to the SensorReadings table. I always have direct access to these values without needing to do any expensive queries. This does denormalize slightly. The query is trivial:
SELECT idSensor,Description,tvLastUpdate,tvLastValue
FROM Sensors
I use this method for data that is queried often. In my case I have a sensor table, and a large event table, that have data coming in at the minute level AND dozens of machines are updating dashboards and graphs with that data. With my data scenario the trigger-and-cache method works well.