In the process of submitting an R package to CRAN, I could not resolve two issues
the reviewer encountered on his system:
1.)
Package has help file(s) containing build-stage \Sexpr{} expresssons but no 'build/partial.rdb' file.
2.)
Checking URLs failed with message:
/home/tmp/CRAN/mypackage.Rcheck/00_pkg_src/mypackage/man/mypackage-package.Rd:6: file ‘./DESCRIPTION’ does not exist
The DESCRIPTION-file is included in the right place.
Unfortunately I cannot give any additional details at this point, because I could not reproduce these
messages on my system and could not figure out their meaning.
What would be possible reasons for these messages?
I figured out what the issues were. The function package.skeleton() I used, which automates some of the setup of a new package, uses the following
commands in the automatically generated documentation file mypackage-package.Rd: \packageTitle{}, \packageDescription{}, \packageAuthor{} and \packageMaintainer{}.
The latter commands use build-stage \Sexpr{} expressions. This and the fact that
the file build/partial.rdb was not present lead to the first NOTE message. Note that build/partial.rdb is not generated automatically by package.skeleton().
The reason for the second NOTE message is very similar: The command \packageTitle{} relates to the DESCRIPTION file in order to extract the package title from the field Title:. However, \packageTitle{} could not find the DESCRIPTION file.
As a solution to these problems I did no longer use the commands \packageTitle{}, \packageDescription{}, \packageAuthor{} and \packageMaintainer{}, but wrote the respective texts in the documentation file mypackage-package.Rd directly.
We created a specific mailing list r-package-devel for these questions. You should probably post there.
And you will need to provide more details, preferably reproducible ones. Right now all I can tell you is that you local errors. Compare against a working package that checks correctly --- CRAN has over 7000 of them.
