可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
Here's the fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/D5h7H/7/
It renders the following:
<div ng-repeat="group in Model.Groups">
<span>{{group.Name}}</span>
<div ng-repeat="filter in group.Filters">
<input type="checkbox" ng-model="filter.enabled">{{filter.Name}}
<select ng-disabled="!filter.enabled">
<option ng-repeat="value in filter.Values">{{value}}</option>
</select>
</div>
</div>
It's a list of filters that is loaded in json from the server and then rendered to the user (in an example json is generated right there in Fiddle). At the moment there are 6 groups of 30 filters in each with 15 option elements for each filter.
In Firefox it now takes about 2 seconds to redraw the UI.
Is this time ok for angular js? Is there anything I'm doing wrong that caused 2sec. rendering (cause 2000 elements doesn't look as a big number to me, but 2sec. is certainly big)?
回答1:
In AngularJS 1.3+, there is One-time binding
built-in:
The main purpose of one-time binding expression is to provide a way to
create a binding that gets deregistered and frees up resources once
the binding is stabilized. Reducing the number of expressions being
watched makes the digest loop faster and allows more information to be
displayed at the same time.
In order to make the one-time binding, prepend ::
to the binding value:
<div>{{::name}}</div>
Also see relevant discussions:
- Render value without data-binding
- How does data binding work in AngularJS?
- Genuinely stop a element from binding - unbind an element - AngularJS
回答2:
You should look at bindonce if you don't need to update the UI after the data has been bound to it. bindonce can also wait until an object has been loaded and then do the binding. It will save you a bunch of time and reduce your $watch()
es dramatically when used right.
回答3:
That's due to how AngularJS does dirty checking. Here's a definitive answer to slow rendering with AngularJS.
回答4:
Using this project: angular-vs-repeat will boost up your performance.
With this, the browser will render (thus angular will do its dirty-checking) to only so many elements that fit in the scrollable container where you render the elements. Demo here
回答5:
I realize this is an old question but I don't think an answer has been posted yet.
I believe the reason your form is slow is not just that you have 2,000+ elements but that those elements are form elements using ng-model
. The built in form validation in Angular is very powerful and convenient but can behave very slowly especially when you first load the form. If those 180(6x30) input elements used something like ng-checked
instead of ng-model
, avoiding form validation mechanism, then you form should load much faster.
<input type="checkbox" ng-checked="filter.enabled">{{filter.Name}}
Reducing watchers with one-time binding via ::
will also help the situation but I think your main issue is with ng-model
and angular form validation.
回答6:
With about 2000 items to load, you needn't to render them all at once. You can aggressivly render them when page scroll, or change page. Refer to this question
Use unique id such as filter id to minimize the time of ng-repeat's creation of all the dom. Refer to tracking-and-duplicates
As the answer of alecxe above, use one-time bounding, if that not proper for you, you can slow the digest frequency with such ng-model-options="{ debounce: 200 }
angular option settings
And last, you have to use some performance analyser tools to track the bottleneck of the application, and fix them.
Hope this helps.
ng-repeat="filter in group.Filters | track by:filter.id | limitTo: NumPerOperation"
回答7:
Using these two angular modules you can make the renderization of your tables much faster.
"quick-ng-repeat"
https://github.com/allaud/quick-ng-repeat
"infinite-scroll"
https://github.com/infinite-scroll/infinite-scroll
Just be aware this is not a solution to improve the performance of your "ng-repeat", this is just a different approach to make your tables faster.
回答8:
Substitute ng-repeat="group in Model.Groups"
with collection-repeat="group in Model.Groups"
.