I am converting our svn repository to git. However, when I run "git svn clone" on our current svn repo, many revisions are getting skipped.
For example, svn revision 2 is skipped, but when I run "svn log -r 2" in our svn repo, there is an entry for it.
It's worth noting that when I just run "svn log" in our svn repo, revision 2 is not listed. It's only shown when referenced directly.
I'm assuming svn history was sort of deleted, but not really, at one point in the past.
How can I do the git svn clone and get all revisions even when deleted from svn, assuming that's the issue?
SVN will not have history deleted usually. I'm not sure if this is possible anyway. You should look at what was changed in that revision. My guess is that only paths were changed that are not part of the history you are converting. But to say this for sure I would need to see the revision changes and your git-svn
command.
But anyway, for a one-time migration git-svn
is not the right tool for conversions of repositories or parts of repositories. It is a great tool if you want to use Git as frontend for an existing SVN server, but for one-time conversions you should not use git-svn
, but svn2git
which is much more suited for this use-case.
There are plenty tools called svn2git
, the probably best one is the KDE one from https://github.com/svn-all-fast-export/svn2git. I strongly recommend using that svn2git
tool. It is the best I know available out there and it is very flexible in what you can do with its rules files.
You will be easily able to configure svn2git
s rule file to produce the result you want from your current SVN layout, including any complex histories like yours that might exist and including producing several Git repos out of one SVN repo or combining different SVN repos into one Git repo cleanly in one run if you like.
If you are not 100% about the history of your repository, svneverever
from http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=763 is a great tool to investigate the history of an SVN repository when migrating it to Git.
Even though git-svn
or the nirvdrum svn2git
is easier to start with, here are some further reasons why using the KDE svn2git
instead of git-svn
is superior, besides its flexibility:
- the history is rebuilt much better and cleaner by
svn2git
(if the correct one is used), this is especially the case for more complex histories with branches and merges and so on
- the tags are real tags and not branches in Git
- with
git-svn
the tags contain an extra empty commit which also makes them not part of the branches, so a normal fetch
will not get them until you give --tags
to the command as by default only tags pointing to fetched branches are fetched also. With the proper svn2git tags are where they belong
- if you changed layout in SVN you can easily configure this with
svn2git
, with git-svn
you will loose history eventually
- with
svn2git
you can also split one SVN repository into multiple Git repositories easily
- or combine multiple SVN repositories in the same SVN root into one Git repository easily
- the conversion is a gazillion times faster with the correct
svn2git
than with git-svn
You see, there are many reasons why git-svn
is worse and the KDE svn2git
is superior. :-)