I have the following template.
template<typename T, typename U>
std::vector<U> map(const std::vector<T> &v, std::function<U(const T&)> f) {
std::vector<U> res;
res.reserve(v.size());
std::transform(std::begin(v), std::end(v), std::end(res), f);
return res;
}
When I use it in my code I have the specify the template parameters. Why is the compiler not able to deduce this for me? How do I have to change my template definition to make this work?
vector<int> numbers = { 1, 3, 5 };
// vector<string> strings = map(numbers, [] (int x) { return string(x,'X'); });
vector<string> strings = map<int, string>(numbers, [] (int x) { return string(x,'X'); });
Runnable code: http://ideone.com/FjGnxd
The original code in this question comes from here: The std::transform-like function that returns transformed container
Your function expects an std::function
argument, but you're calling it with a lambda expression instead. The two are not the same type. A lambda is convertible to std::function
, but template argument deduction requires exact matches and user defined conversions are not considered. Hence the deduction failure.
Deduction does work if you actually pass an std::function
to map()
.
std::function<string(int const&)> fn = [] (int x) { return string(x,'X'); };
vector<string> strings = map(numbers, fn);
Live demo
One possible workaround to avoid having to specify the template arguments is to modify the function to accept any kind of callable, rather than an std::function
object.
template<typename T, typename Func>
std::vector<typename std::result_of<Func(T)>::type>
map(const std::vector<T> &v, Func f) {
// ...
}
Another version of the same idea, using decltype
and declval
instead of result_of
template<typename T, typename Func>
std::vector<decltype(std::declval<Func>()(std::declval<T>()))>
map(const std::vector<T> &v, Func f) {
// ...
}
Finally, using a trailing return type
template<typename T, typename Func>
auto map(const std::vector<T> &v, Func f)
-> std::vector<decltype(f(v[0]))> {
// ...
}
Live demo