It is frequent in my practice that a variable/argument is to store a type of something (as an enumeration value usually). And it usually makes no sense to specify an entity class in the name (like userType when a function is onlu intended to handle users). Is there a way I can use the "type" word for my needs instead of using scaffolds like "tipe", "kind", "somethingType" instead of it? The actual Scala type
keyword is of such a rare use - it would be nice If I could undefine it (as a keyword) in the most of my code files.
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
回答1:
You can escape with backticks:
val `type` = 5