I know that a lot of people have posted a similar question but with the g
flag, none of the "hacks" seem to work for me properly (meaning they don't work most of the time). Yes I want the g
flag The regex I've made is:
\~\![A-Za-z]+\ start(?:(?:(?:\(|,)\ ?[\w]+)*?\))\:\{([\S\s]+?)(?:(?<!\\)\}\:end)
This works fine when negative look-behind is supported. But when I do it in JavaScript. It doesn't support negative look behind. Here's the part where the problem lies:
(?:(?<!\\)\}\:end)
What it should match:
\}:end <- Not this
}:end <- This
foo}:end <- This
I've tried:
- Javascript: negative lookbehind equivalent?
- JavaScript negative lookbehind issue
Instead using lookbehind you can use lookahead
e.g.
abcdefg;}hijklmn#}
to get
$1 = `abcdefg;}hijklmn`
$2 = `#}`
using lookbehind approach you can do
(.*)(?<!#})(#})
see: DEMO (lookbehind approach)
which here prevent a duplication of #}
by using negative lookbehind.
On the other hand, lookahead approach is also possible by "spawning lookahead",
let's consider our example text
abcdefg;}hijklmn#}
become
%a%b%c%d%e%f%g%;%}%h%i%j%k%l%m%n%#}
here %
s represent to lookahead.
How we can spawn lookahead like that?
Let's consider lookahead approach regex for our example text
((?:(?!#}).)*)(#})
see: DEMO (lookahead approach)
A trick here is spawning lookahead together with .
where the regex ((?:(?!#}).)*)
can be expanded to
((?!#}).(?!#}).(?!#}).(?!#}).(?!#}).(?!#}).) and so on
that means it will check for every letters to guarantee you that there is no #}
in (.*)
.
Thus, if apply this strategy to your regex you will get
\~\![A-Za-z]+\ start(?:(?:(?:\(|,)\ ?[\w]+)*?\))\:\{((?:(?!\}\:end\n)[\S\s])+)(?:\}\:end)
see: DEMO
\~\![A-Za-z]+\ start(?:(?:(?:\(|,)\ ?[\w]+)*?\))\:\{([\S\s]+?)(?:[^\\]\}\:end)
Try this, see the demo:
https://regex101.com/r/uE3cC4/17