The following code comes from Google's recaptcha library. Instead of using stdClass, they used a separate class. I understand why this would be helpful if they were pre-setting properties (either to a given value or even to NULL), but don't see why they did so in this case. Is there any value to doing it as they did, or would stdClass be more appropriate?
class ReCaptchaResponse {
var $is_valid;
var $error;
}
$recaptcha_response = new ReCaptchaResponse();
$recaptcha_response->is_valid = false;
$recaptcha_response->error = 'incorrect-captcha-sol';
This is partly a matter of opinion, but personally I have never used stdClass, and I've never understood the point of doing so.
The purpose of an object is to encapsulate data and behaviour, whether that's by adding public and private methods to the object, using inheritance and polymorphism to structure your project, or just having a well-defined named type.
In some languages, e.g. JavaScript, an object is useful as a general-purpose key-value store, even if properties are added completely ad hoc; in PHP, that role can simply and effectively be filled by an associative array.
Some people will use stdClass objects as key-value stores, but they lose the use of all the functions around arrays by doing so. As ZubaiR points out above an object will be passed/assigned as a kind of pointer (not the same as passing a variable by reference) rather than being copied as necessary, so will behave differently, but if you're not deliberately using the "encapsulation" aspect of OOP (in which case you would probably create a class), it's hard to say if this is a good thing or just a chance for confusion.
In other languages, such as C, there is a way of defining custom "struct" types, with pre-defined named members. PHP has no such type, but a simple methodless class like the one you show is pretty close.
Another advantage in other languages that doesn't apply in PHP is that the base class for objects could have some functionality, or even - as in JavaScript or Ruby - allow you to add some functionality. In PHP, stdClass is completely inert and cannot be edited, and as pointed out elsewhere is not in fact used as a base class for other objects; it's only "magic" ability is to be the target class when something is cast or "juggled" to be of type object.
The immediate benefits of using a named class include:
- the PHP engine, and tools such as IDEs and code sniffers, know which properties "should" exist, and can warn you if you set invalid ones, e.g. through a spelling mistake
- you can check if a particular value passed is the right type of object (using
instanceOf) rather than
- you can easily expand the object later to have extra functionality, or make it part of an inheritance hierarchy, etc
Is there any value to doing it as they did, or would stdClass be more appropriate
ReCapchaResponse is more user friendly than stdClass- Adds possibility to extend the class in future without modifying other sections.
Why use stdClass at all ? Can't we use arrays for all the same cases ?
If you want to pass a data from one function to another and also modify the data then you can use stdClass. You can do the same with associative array but then you have a possibility of an error if you miss call by reference.
$a = array();
function test1(&$a) {
$a['key'] = 1234;
}
test($a);
function test2($a) { // possible error
$a['key'] = 1234;
}
test2($a);
$a = new stdClass();
function test3($a) {
$a->key = 1234;
}
test3($a);
But this type of structure is highly unlikely in practical scenario.
ReCaptchaResponse is nicer to read and more comprehensible than stdClass.
But programmatically it's the same.
For example, think about this class as interface and extendability in the future. ReCaptchaResponse is also stdClass.
You should ask author about his idea.
