I use memtables to wire enumerated type with comboboxes using LiveBinding.
However I have a lot of them and they way I am doing is way too bad (copy/paste)
For example, I have the following enumeration:
TEnumResourceType = (trtApp, trtTab, trtSection, trtField, trtCommand, trtOther);
and for that I created a function to give the string equivalent:
function EnumResourceTypeToStr(AEnum: TNaharEnumResourceType): string;
begin
case AEnum of
trtApp : result := 'Aplicação';
trtTab : result := 'Pagina (Tab)';
trtSection : result := 'Secção';
trtField : result := 'Campo';
trtCommand : result := 'Comando';
trtOther : result := 'Outro';
end;
end;
In a datamodule I place my memtable and I need to populate it, I am using the AFTEROPEN event of the table with the following code:
procedure TDMGlobalSystem.vtResourceTypeAfterOpen(DataSet: TDataSet);
var
enum : TEnumResourceType;
begin
inherited;
for enum := Low(TEnumResourceType) to High(TEnumResourceType) do
DataSet.InsertRecord([EnumResourceTypeToStr(enum), Ord(enum)]);
end;
All that works, however I need to do that for each new enumaration and I have dozens. Eventually I will need to change my current memtable to other and that is an added concern to automate the process. The current memtable sometimes does not work on Android.
I am looking in a way to automate this process, or using generics, or whatever, that in the DataModule I only need something like: PopulateEnum(Table, Enum);
The best solution would be creating a component inherited from this memtable and somehow define what is the enum required and all the magic happens (including the selection of the enumtostr)
Here is a generic wrapper for enums to get an array of integer
,string
pair representing the ordinal value and the name for the enums.
A little test
program so_24955704;
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
{$R *.res}
uses
System.SysUtils,
EnumValueStore in 'EnumValueStore.pas';
type
TEnumResourceType = ( trtApp, trtTab, trtSection, trtField, trtCommand, trtOther );
procedure PrintEnumValueStore( AEnumValueStore : TEnumValueStore );
var
LEnumValuePair : TEnumValuePair;
begin
for LEnumValuePair in AEnumValueStore.GetKeyValues do
begin
Writeln( LEnumValuePair.Key, '-', LEnumValuePair.Value );
end;
end;
procedure TestEnum;
var
LEnumValueStore : TEnumValueStore<TEnumResourceType>;
begin
LEnumValueStore := TEnumValueStore<TEnumResourceType>.Create;
try
// print default names
PrintEnumValueStore( LEnumValueStore );
WriteLn;
// set the custom names
LEnumValueStore.SetValue( trtApp, 'Aplicação' );
LEnumValueStore.SetValue( trtTab, 'Pagina (Tab)' );
LEnumValueStore.SetValue( trtSection, 'Secção' );
LEnumValueStore.SetValue( trtField, 'Campo' );
LEnumValueStore.SetValue( trtCommand, 'Comando' );
LEnumValueStore.SetValue( trtOther, 'Outro' );
// print the default values
PrintEnumValueStore( LEnumValueStore );
finally
LEnumValueStore.Free;
end;
end;
begin
try
TestEnum;
except
on E : Exception do
Writeln( E.ClassName, ': ', E.Message );
end;
ReadLn;
end.
will produce the following output
0-App
1-Tab
2-Section
3-Field
4-Command
5-Other
0-Aplicação
1-Pagina (Tab)
2-Secção
3-Campo
4-Comando
5-Outro
and here is the unit that will do the work
unit EnumValueStore;
interface
uses
System.Generics.Collections;
type
TEnumValuePair = TPair<Integer, string>;
TEnumValueStore = class abstract
public
function GetKeyValues : TArray<TEnumValuePair>; virtual; abstract;
end;
TEnumValueStore<TEnumKey> = class( TEnumValueStore )
private
FValueDict : TDictionary<TEnumKey, string>;
public
constructor Create;
destructor Destroy; override;
procedure SetValue( AKey : TEnumKey; const AValue : string );
function GetKeyValues : TArray<TEnumValuePair>; override;
end;
implementation
uses
SimpleGenericEnum;
{ TEnumValueStore<TEnumKey> }
constructor TEnumValueStore<TEnumKey>.Create;
begin
inherited Create;
FValueDict := TDictionary<TEnumKey, string>.Create;
end;
destructor TEnumValueStore<TEnumKey>.Destroy;
begin
FValueDict.Free;
inherited;
end;
function TEnumValueStore<TEnumKey>.GetKeyValues : TArray<TEnumValuePair>;
var
LEnum : TEnum<TEnumKey>;
LMin, LMax : Integer;
LCount : Integer;
LIdx : Integer;
LStr : string;
begin
LMin := LEnum.Ord( LEnum.Low );
LMax := LEnum.Ord( LEnum.High );
LCount := LMax - LMin + 1;
SetLength( Result, LCount );
LCount := 0;
for LIdx := LMin to LMax do
begin
LEnum := LIdx;
if FValueDict.ContainsKey( LEnum )
then
LStr := FValueDict[LEnum]
else
LStr := LEnum;
Result[LCount] := TEnumValuePair.Create( LEnum, LStr );
Inc( LCount );
end;
end;
procedure TEnumValueStore<TEnumKey>.SetValue( AKey : TEnumKey; const AValue : string );
begin
FValueDict.AddOrSetValue( AKey, AValue );
end;
end.
I use the unit SimpleGenericEnum
but there is a small bug inside you need to correct
class function TEnum<T>.High: T;
begin
// original code
// Result := Cast(_TypeData.MaxValue);
Result := Cast(GetTypeData.MaxValue);
end;
class function TEnum<T>.Low: T;
begin
// original code
// Result := Cast(_TypeData.MinValue);
Result := Cast(GetTypeData.MinValue);
end;
I would have said you have two easier choices here
Your could replace EnumResourceTypeToStr(enum)
with GetEnumName(TypeInfo(TEnumResourceType), ord(enum))
or some variation on it. This has the disadvantage that it simply returns the enum as it appears in your program.
Alternatively add a constant EnumNames: array [TEnumResourceType] of string = ('....
etc. populated with your list of strings. These can then be accessed as EnumNames[enum]
. This allows you arbitrary strings and the compiler will remind you to add additional entries if you extend the enumeration.