This question was asked to me in an interview:
In C++,
- what if we allocate memory using
malloc
and use delete
to free that allocated memory?
- what if we allocate the memory using
new
and free it using free
?
What are the problems that we would face if the above things are used in the code?
My answer was there is no difference. Was I right in saying so?
If you do so you will run into undefined behavior. Never try that. Although new
might be implemented through malloc()
and delete
might be implemented through free()
there's no guarantee that they are really implemented that way and also the user can overload new
and delete
at his discretion. You risk running into heap corruption.
Other than that don't forget that when you call malloc()
you get raw memory - no constructor is invoked - and when you call free()
no destructor is invoked. This can as well lead to undefined behavior and improper functioning of the program.
The bottom line is... never do this.
1) Undefined behaviour but will probably "work" though. Destructors will get called on the memory being freed that pobably doesn't want to be deconstructed.
2) Undefined behaviour but will probably "work" though. Destructors will NOT get called.
ie IF it works, and there is no guarantee of that, then it will only, likely, work exactly as required for basic builtin data types.